Suppr超能文献

体外受精中单胚胎移植后胚胎培养液类型对新生儿出生体重的影响。

The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF.

机构信息

IVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2619-26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des252. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does the type of medium used to culture fresh and frozen-thawed embryos influence neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer (SET) in IVF?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A comparison of two commercially available culture media showed no significant influence on mean birthweight and mean birthweight adjusted for gestational age, gender and parity (z-scores) of singletons born after a fresh or frozen-thawed SET. Furthermore, we show that embryo freezing and thawing cycles may lead to a significantly higher mean birthweight.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Animal studies have shown that culture media constituents are responsible for changes in birthweight of offspring. In human IVF, there is still little knowledge of the effect of medium type on birthweight. Until now, only a small number of commercially available culture media have been investigated (Vitrolife, Cook(®) Medical and IVF online medium). Our study adds new information: it has a larger population of singleton births compared with the previously published studies, it includes outcomes of other media types (HTF and Sage(®)), not previously analysed, and it includes data on frozen-thawed SETs.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis of birthweights of singleton newborns after fresh (Day 3) or frozen-thawed (Day 5) SET cycles, using embryos cultured in either of two different types of commercially available culture media, between 2008 and 2011.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Before January 2009, a single-step culture medium was used: human tubal fluid (HTF) with 4 mg/ml human serum albumin. From January 2009 onwards, a commercially available sequential medium was introduced: Sage(®), Quinn's advantage protein plus medium. Singletons born after a fresh SET (99 embryos cultured in HTF and 259 in Sage(®)) and singletons born after a frozen-thawed SET (32 embryos cultured in HTF only, 41 in HTF and Sage(®) and 86 in Sage(®) only) were analysed. Only patients using autologous gametes without the use of a gestational carrier were considered. Also excluded were (vanishing) twins, triplets, babies with congenital or chromosomal abnormalities and babies born before 22 weeks of gestation.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Analysis of 358 singletons born after a fresh SET and 159 singletons born after a frozen-thawed SET showed no significant difference between the HTF and Sage(®) groups in terms of birthweight. Gestational age, parity and gender of the baby were significantly related to birthweight in multiple linear regression analyses, and other possible confounding factors included maternal age, BMI and smoking, the number of blastomeres in the transferred embryo and the type of culture medium. Maternal age, BMI and smoking, gestational age at birth, gender of the baby and the percentage of firstborns did not differ significantly between the HTF and Sage(®) groups; however, among the fresh embryos, those cultured in Sage(®) had significantly more blastomeres at the time of embryo transfer compared with the embryos cultured in HTF. Birthweights adjusted for gestational age and gender or gestational age and parity (z-scores) were not significantly different between the HTF and Sage(®) groups for fresh or frozen-thawed SETs. Mean birthweight, as well as the mean birthweight among firstborns and the mean birthweights adjusted for gestational age and gender or parity (z-scores) were significantly higher in the cryopreservation group compared with the fresh embryo transfer group.

BIAS, CONFOUNDING AND OTHER REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our study is limited by its retrospective design and only two commercially available types of culture media were tested. More research is necessary to investigate the potential influence of culture media on gene expression.

GENERALIZABILITY TO OTHER POPULATIONS

Although our data do not indicate the major influences of the HTF and Sage(®) culture media on birthweight, our results cannot be extrapolated to other culture media types. Furthermore, there remains a potential influence of embryo culture environment on epigenetic variation not represented by birthweight differences but by more subtle features.

摘要

研究问题

培养新鲜和冷冻解冻胚胎的培养基类型是否会影响体外受精(IVF)中单胚胎移植(SET)后的新生儿出生体重?

总结答案

比较两种市售培养基发现,新鲜或冷冻解冻 SET 后出生的单胎的平均出生体重和调整胎龄、性别和产次(z 评分)的平均出生体重没有显著差异。此外,我们表明胚胎冷冻和解冻周期可能导致平均出生体重显著升高。

已知内容和本文新增信息

动物研究表明,培养基成分会影响后代的出生体重。在人类 IVF 中,关于培养基类型对出生体重的影响知之甚少。到目前为止,只有少数几种市售培养基(Vitrolife、Cook(®)Medical 和 IVF online 培养基)得到了研究。我们的研究增加了新的信息:与之前发表的研究相比,它的单胎出生率更大,包括之前未分析的其他培养基类型(HTF 和 Sage(®))的结果,以及冷冻解冻 SET 的数据。

设计

本研究是对 2008 年至 2011 年间新鲜(第 3 天)或冷冻解冻(第 5 天)SET 周期后出生的单胎新生儿出生体重的回顾性分析,使用两种不同的市售培养基培养胚胎。

参与者和设置

在 2009 年 1 月之前,使用单步培养培养基:含有 4mg/ml 人血清白蛋白的人输卵管液(HTF)。从 2009 年 1 月开始,引入了一种市售的序贯培养基:Sage(®),Quinn's advantage protein plus 培养基。分析了新鲜 SET 后出生的单胎(99 个胚胎在 HTF 中培养,259 个在 Sage(®)中培养)和冷冻解冻 SET 后出生的单胎(仅在 HTF 中培养的 32 个胚胎,在 HTF 和 Sage(®)中培养的 41 个胚胎,仅在 Sage(®)中培养的 86 个胚胎)。仅考虑使用自体配子且不使用妊娠载体的患者。还排除了(消失)双胞胎、三胞胎、先天性或染色体异常的婴儿以及 22 周前出生的婴儿。

主要结果及其偶然性作用

对 358 名新鲜 SET 后出生的单胎和 159 名冷冻解冻 SET 后出生的单胎进行分析,HTF 和 Sage(®)组之间的出生体重没有显著差异。在多元线性回归分析中,婴儿的胎龄、产次和性别与出生体重显著相关,其他可能的混杂因素包括母亲年龄、BMI 和吸烟、转移胚胎的卵裂球数和培养基类型。在 HTF 和 Sage(®)组之间,母亲年龄、BMI 和吸烟、出生时的胎龄、婴儿的性别和头胎比例没有显著差异;然而,在新鲜胚胎中,在 Sage(®)中培养的胚胎在胚胎转移时具有明显更多的卵裂球,与在 HTF 中培养的胚胎相比。新鲜或冷冻解冻 SET 后,HTF 和 Sage(®)组出生体重调整胎龄和性别或胎龄和产次(z 评分)的差异均无统计学意义。冷冻组的平均出生体重以及头胎的平均出生体重和调整胎龄和性别或产次(z 评分)的平均出生体重均显著高于新鲜胚胎移植组。

偏倚、混杂因素和其他注意事项:我们的研究受到其回顾性设计的限制,仅测试了两种市售的培养基。需要进一步研究以调查培养基对基因表达的潜在影响。

在其他人群中的普遍性

尽管我们的数据并未表明 HTF 和 Sage(®)培养基对出生体重的主要影响,但我们的结果不能外推到其他培养基类型。此外,胚胎培养环境对表观遗传变异的潜在影响仍然存在,这种影响不能仅通过出生体重的差异来代表,而需要更细微的特征来代表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验