National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040379. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
After repeated exposures to two successive audiovisual stimuli presented in one frequent order, participants eventually perceive a pair separated by some lag time in the same order as occurring simultaneously (lag adaptation). In contrast, we previously found that perceptual changes occurred in the opposite direction in response to tactile stimuli, conforming to bayesian integration theory (bayesian calibration). We further showed, in theory, that the effect of bayesian calibration cannot be observed when the lag adaptation was fully operational. This led to the hypothesis that bayesian calibration affects judgments regarding the order of audiovisual stimuli, but that this effect is concealed behind the lag adaptation mechanism. In the present study, we showed that lag adaptation is pitch-insensitive using two sounds at 1046 and 1480 Hz. This enabled us to cancel lag adaptation by associating one pitch with sound-first stimuli and the other with light-first stimuli. When we presented each type of stimulus (high- or low-tone) in a different block, the point of simultaneity shifted to "sound-first" for the pitch associated with sound-first stimuli, and to "light-first" for the pitch associated with light-first stimuli. These results are consistent with lag adaptation. In contrast, when we delivered each type of stimulus in a randomized order, the point of simultaneity shifted to "light-first" for the pitch associated with sound-first stimuli, and to "sound-first" for the pitch associated with light-first stimuli. The results clearly show that bayesian calibration is pitch-specific and is at work behind pitch-insensitive lag adaptation during temporal order judgment of audiovisual stimuli.
在重复暴露于两个连续的视听刺激中,这些刺激以一种频繁的顺序呈现,参与者最终会感知到一对在时间上有滞后的刺激,其顺序与同时发生的顺序相同(滞后适应)。相比之下,我们之前发现,当触觉刺激的顺序与贝叶斯整合理论(贝叶斯校准)相反时,会发生感知变化。我们进一步从理论上表明,当滞后适应完全运行时,无法观察到贝叶斯校准的效果。这导致了一个假设,即贝叶斯校准会影响对视听刺激顺序的判断,但这种效果被滞后适应机制所掩盖。在本研究中,我们使用 1046 和 1480 Hz 的两个声音表明滞后适应对音高不敏感。这使我们能够通过将一个音高与声音第一刺激相关联,将另一个音高与光第一刺激相关联,从而消除滞后适应。当我们在不同的块中呈现每种类型的刺激(高音或低音)时,与声音第一刺激相关联的音高的同时点会转移到“声音第一”,而与光第一刺激相关联的音高的同时点会转移到“光第一”。这些结果与滞后适应一致。相比之下,当我们以随机顺序呈现每种类型的刺激时,与声音第一刺激相关联的音高的同时点会转移到“光第一”,而与光第一刺激相关联的音高的同时点会转移到“声音第一”。结果清楚地表明,贝叶斯校准是音高特异性的,并且在听觉和视觉刺激的时间顺序判断中,滞后适应对音高不敏感。