• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CareTrack:评估澳大利亚医疗服务提供的适宜性。

CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia.

机构信息

University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):100-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10510.

DOI:10.5694/mja12.10510
PMID:22794056
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the percentage of health care encounters at which a sample of adult Australians received appropriate care (ie, care in line with evidence-based or consensus-based guidelines).

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Computer-assisted telephone interviews and retrospective review of the medical records (for 2009-2010) of a sample of at least 1000 Australian adults to measure compliance with 522 expert consensus indicators representing appropriate care for 22 common conditions. Participants were selected from households in areas of South Australia and New South Wales chosen to be representative of the socioeconomic profile of Australians. Health care encounters occurred in health care practices and hospitals with general practitioners, specialists, physiotherapists, chiropractors, psychologists and counsellors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of health care encounters at which the sample received appropriate care.

RESULTS

From 15 292 households contacted by telephone, 7649 individuals agreed to participate, 3567 consented, 2638 proved eligible, and 1154 were included after gaining the consent of their health care providers. The adult Australians in this sample received appropriate care at 57% (95% CI, 54%-60%) of 35 573 eligible health care encounters. Compliance with indicators of appropriate care at condition level ranged from 13% (95% CI, 1%-43%) for alcohol dependence to 90% (95% CI, 85%-93%) for coronary artery disease. For health care providers with more than 300 eligible encounters each, overall compliance ranged from 32% to 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were pockets of excellence and some aspects of care were well managed across health care providers, the consistent delivery of appropriate care needs improvement, and gaps in care should be addressed. There is a need for national agreement on clinical standards and better structuring of medical records to facilitate the delivery of more appropriate care.

摘要

目的

确定一定比例的澳大利亚成年人在接受医疗服务时能够获得适当的医疗服务(即符合循证或共识指南的医疗服务)。

设计、地点和参与者:对至少 1000 名澳大利亚成年人进行计算机辅助电话访谈和回顾性病历审查(2009-2010 年),以衡量 522 项专家共识指标的符合率,这些指标代表 22 种常见疾病的适当治疗。参与者是从南澳大利亚和新南威尔士州选择的具有代表性的澳大利亚社会经济状况的家庭中选出的。医疗服务发生在普通科医生、专科医生、物理治疗师、脊医、心理学家和顾问的医疗服务场所和医院。

主要观察指标

接受适当治疗的医疗服务比例。

结果

通过电话联系了 15292 户家庭,其中 7649 户同意参与,3567 户同意,2638 户符合条件,在获得医疗服务提供者同意后,有 1154 户纳入研究。在 35573 次符合条件的医疗服务中,该样本中的澳大利亚成年人有 57%(95%可信区间,54%-60%)接受了适当的治疗。在疾病层面,适当治疗指标的符合率从酒精依赖症的 13%(95%可信区间,1%-43%)到冠状动脉疾病的 90%(95%可信区间,85%-93%)不等。对于每个提供者有 300 次以上符合条件的就诊的情况,总体符合率从 32%到 86%不等。

结论

尽管在医疗服务提供者中有一些优秀的领域,并且一些方面的治疗管理得很好,但仍需要改进一致提供适当治疗的能力,并应解决治疗方面的差距。需要在全国范围内就临床标准达成一致,并更好地构建病历,以促进提供更适当的治疗。

相似文献

1
CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia.CareTrack:评估澳大利亚医疗服务提供的适宜性。
Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):100-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10510.
2
iCareTrack: measuring the appropriateness of eyecare delivery in Australia.iCareTrack:测量澳大利亚眼科保健服务的适宜性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Jul;40(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/opo.12699. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Surgical site infection-a population-based study in Australian adults measuring the compliance with and correct timing of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis.手术部位感染——一项基于澳大利亚成年人的研究,评估适当抗生素预防措施的依从性和正确时机。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jul;43(4):461-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300407.
4
Can the appropriateness of eye care be measured through cross-sectional retrospective patient record review in eye care practices in Australia? The iCareTrack feasibility study.在澳大利亚的眼科保健实践中,通过对患者病历的回顾性横断面研究,能否衡量眼科保健的适宜性?iCareTrack 可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e024298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024298.
5
Assessing the appropriateness of prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in Australia: a cross-sectional study.评估澳大利亚静脉血栓栓塞预防与管理的适宜性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 9;6(3):e008618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008618.
6
Guideline adherence in the management of head injury in Australian children: A population-based sample survey.澳大利亚儿童头部损伤管理中的指南遵循情况:基于人群的抽样调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 11;15(2):e0228715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228715. eCollection 2020.
7
CareTrack: Toward Appropriate Care for Low Back Pain.CareTrack:迈向对下背痛的恰当护理。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):E802-E809. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001972.
8
CareTrack Kids-part 2. Assessing the appropriateness of the healthcare delivered to Australian children: study protocol for a retrospective medical record review.儿童护理追踪——第2部分。评估为澳大利亚儿童提供的医疗服务的适宜性:一项回顾性病历审查的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007749.
9
Assessing the appropriateness of paediatric antibiotic overuse in Australian children: a population-based sample survey.评估澳大利亚儿童中儿科抗生素过度使用的适宜性:基于人群的抽样调查。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Apr 24;20(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02052-6.
10
The quality of preventive care for pre-school aged children in Australian general practice.澳大利亚普通实践中对学龄前儿童预防保健的质量。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 6;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1455-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Twenty-One Years and Still Going Strong: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Contribution of Young Adult, Adolescent, and Stakeholder Involvement to the Resilience of a Type 1 Diabetes Transition Program.二十一年来始终蓬勃发展:一项定性研究,探索青年、青少年及利益相关者的参与对1型糖尿病过渡项目恢复力的贡献。
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70419. doi: 10.1111/hex.70419.
2
Protocol for the comparison of remote versus face-to-face osteoarthritis management programs (COASTAL): A randomized implementation trial.远程与面对面骨关节炎管理项目比较方案(COASTAL):一项随机实施试验
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025 Jul 8;7(3):100647. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100647. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
How Is Chronic Pain Managed in Rural Australia? A Qualitative Study Exploring Rural Healthcare Professional and Consumer Experiences.
澳大利亚农村地区的慢性疼痛如何管理?一项探索农村医疗保健专业人员和消费者经历的定性研究。
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Feb;33(1):e70000. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70000.
4
Evaluation of a Telehealth Paediatric Asthma and Allergy Clinic Patient Follow-Up During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间远程医疗儿科哮喘与过敏诊所患者随访情况评估
Children (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;11(12):1507. doi: 10.3390/children11121507.
5
"All of these things interact, that's why it's such a wicked problem": Stakeholders' perspectives of what hinders low back pain care in Australia and how to improve it.“所有这些因素相互作用,这就是为什么它是一个棘手的问题”:利益相关者对澳大利亚下腰痛治疗的阻碍因素以及如何改善这些因素的看法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 11;22(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01222-7.
6
What proportion of women presenting to the emergency department with early pregnancy bleeding receive appropriate care?因早期妊娠出血而到急诊科就诊的女性中,有多大比例得到了适当的护理?
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14507. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14507. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
7
Process evaluation of a cluster randomised implementation trial examining strategies to increase early access to exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: protocol.群组随机实施试验的过程评估,旨在研究增加膝骨关节炎患者早期进行锻炼的策略:方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e090360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090360.
8
Pain, comorbidities, and clinical decision-making: conceptualization, development, and pilot testing of the Pain in Aging, Educational Assessment of Need instrument.疼痛、合并症与临床决策:老年疼痛教育需求评估工具的概念化、开发及预试验
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 22;5:1254792. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1254792. eCollection 2024.
9
Effectiveness of a telehealth-delivered clinician-supported exercise and weight loss program for hip osteoarthritis - protocol for the Better Hip randomised controlled trial.远程医疗提供的临床医生支持的运动和减肥计划对髋骨关节炎的有效性 - Better Hip 随机对照试验方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 13;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07131-0.
10
The quality of care delivered to residents in long-term care in Australia: an indicator-based review of resident records (CareTrack Aged study).澳大利亚长期护理中向居民提供的护理质量:基于指标的居民记录审查(CareTrack 老年研究)。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03224-8.