The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore—Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;73(6):e757-66. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07691.
To assess the utility of antipsychotics for weight gain and improvement of illness-related psychopathology in patients with anorexia nervosa.
PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, and PsycINFO citations from the inception of the databases until March 27, 2012, were searched without language restrictions using the following keywords: randomized, random, randomly, and anorexia nervosa. In addition, we hand-searched for additional studies eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis and contacted authors for unpublished data.
Included in this study were randomized placebo- or usual care-controlled trials of antipsychotics in patients with anorexia nervosa.
Two independent evaluators extracted data. The primary outcome of interest was body weight, expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) between the 2 groups in baseline to endpoint change of body mass index (BMI), endpoint BMI, or daily weight change. SMD, risk ratio (RR), and number needed to harm (NNH) ± 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Across 8 studies (mean duration = 9.6 weeks; range, 7-12 weeks), 221 patients (mean age = 22.5 years, 219 [99.1%] females) with anorexia nervosa were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n = 54), quetiapine (n = 15), risperidone (n = 18), pimozide (n = 8), sulpiride (n = 9), placebo (n = 99), or usual care (n = 18). Both individually (P = .11 to P = .47) and pooled together (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.56; P = .06, I2 = 0%; 7 studies, n = 195), weight/BMI effects were not significantly different between antipsychotics and placebo/usual care. Moreover, pooled antipsychotics and placebo/usual care did not differ regarding scores on questionnaires related to anorexia nervosa (P = .32, 5 studies, n = 114), body shape (P = .91, 4 studies, n = 100), depressive symptoms (P = .08, 4 studies, n = 103), and anxiety (P = .53, 4 studies, n = 121). Individually, quetiapine (1 study, n = 33) outperformed usual care regarding eating disorder attitudes (P = .01) and anxiety (P = .02). While rates of dropout due to any reason (P = .83, I2 = 0%) and due to adverse events (P = .54, I2 = 5%) were similar in both groups, drowsiness/sedation occurred significantly more often with antipsychotics than placebo/usual care (RR = 3.69, 95% CI, 1.37-9.95; I2 = 67%, P = .01; NNH = 2, P = .001; 5 studies, n = 129), but most other adverse effects were only sparsely reported.
Although limited by small samples, this meta-analysis failed to demonstrate antipsychotic efficacy for body weight and related outcomes in females with anorexia nervosa.
评估抗精神病药物在神经性厌食症患者中增加体重和改善与疾病相关的精神病理学的效用。
检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆数据库和 PsycINFO 数据库,检索时间截至 2012 年 3 月 27 日,使用了以下关键词进行无语言限制的搜索:随机、随机、随机和神经性厌食症。此外,我们还手动搜索了符合纳入本 meta 分析条件的其他研究,并联系作者获取未发表的数据。
包括在神经性厌食症患者中使用抗精神病药物的随机安慰剂或常规治疗对照试验。
两名独立评估者提取数据。主要研究终点是体重,以两组基线到体重指数(BMI)终点变化、终点 BMI 或每日体重变化的标准化均数差(SMD)表示。计算了 SMD、风险比(RR)和需要治疗的人数(NNH)±95%置信区间(CI)。
在 8 项研究(平均持续时间=9.6 周;范围,7-12 周)中,221 名患有神经性厌食症的患者(平均年龄 22.5 岁,219[99.1%]名女性)被随机分配至奥氮平(n=54)、喹硫平(n=15)、利培酮(n=18)、匹莫齐特(n=8)、舒必利(n=9)、安慰剂(n=99)或常规治疗(n=18)。单独(P=从.11 到 P=.47)和汇总(SMD=0.27,95%CI,-0.01 至 0.56;P=.06,I2=0%;7 项研究,n=195)来看,抗精神病药物和安慰剂/常规治疗之间的体重/BMI 效果没有显著差异。此外,汇总的抗精神病药物和安慰剂/常规治疗在与神经性厌食症相关的问卷评分方面没有差异(P=.32,5 项研究,n=114)、体型(P=.91,4 项研究,n=100)、抑郁症状(P=.08,4 项研究,n=103)和焦虑(P=.53,4 项研究,n=121)。单独来看,喹硫平(n=33)在饮食障碍态度(P=.01)和焦虑(P=.02)方面优于常规治疗。尽管两组的任何原因导致的辍学率(P=.83,I2=0%)和因不良事件导致的辍学率(P=.54,I2=5%)相似,但与安慰剂/常规治疗相比,抗精神病药物导致困倦/镇静的发生率显著更高(RR=3.69,95%CI,1.37-9.95;I2=67%,P=.01;NNH=2,P=.001;5 项研究,n=129),但大多数其他不良反应的报告很少。
尽管样本量较小,但这项 meta 分析未能证明抗精神病药物在女性神经性厌食症患者中对体重和相关结局的疗效。