Center for Clinical Heart Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.
Thromb Res. 2012 Sep;130(3):424-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
Aspirin inhibits the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) mediated thromboxane A2 synthesis. Despite COX-1 inhibition, in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), platelets can be activated through other mechanisms, like activation by thrombin.
At baseline in this cross-sectional substudy of the ASCET trial, 1001 stable CAD patients, all on single aspirin treatment, were classified by the PFA100® method, as having high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity (RPR) or not. Markers of hypercoagulability, endothelial and platelet activation as related to RPR, were evaluated to explore the potential mechanisms behind high on-aspirin RPR.
Altogether, 25.9% (n=259) of the patients were found to have high on-aspirin RPR. S-thromboxane B(2) levels were very low and did not differ between patients having high on-aspirin RPR or not. Patients with high on-aspirin RPR had significantly higher levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) (124 vs 100%, p<0.001, platelet count (236 vs 224 × 10(9)/l, p=0.008), total TFPI (68.4 vs 65.5 ng/ml, p=0.005) and ß-thromboglobulin (ß-TG) (33.3 vs 31.3 IU/ml, p=0.041) compared to patients with low on-aspirin RPR. No significant differences between the groups were observed in levels of endogenous thrombin generation (ETP), pro-thrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), D-dimer, soluble TF (sTF) or P-selectin (all p>0.05).
The high on-aspirin RPR as defined by PFA100® seems not to be due to increased thrombin activity as evaluated with ETP, sTF, F1+2 or D-dimer. The elevated levels of platelet count, ß-TG, TFPI and especially vWF might be explained by increased endothelial and platelet activation in these patients.
阿司匹林抑制环氧化酶-1(COX-1)介导的血栓素 A2 合成。尽管抑制了 COX-1,但在患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,血小板仍可通过其他机制被激活,例如通过凝血酶激活。
在 ASCET 试验的这项横断面亚研究的基线时,1001 名稳定 CAD 患者均接受单剂量阿司匹林治疗,根据 PFA100®方法将他们分为高阿司匹林残留血小板反应性(RPR)或无高阿司匹林残留血小板反应性。评估与高阿司匹林 RPR 相关的高凝标志物、内皮和血小板激活,以探讨高阿司匹林 RPR 背后的潜在机制。
总共,25.9%(n=259)的患者被发现具有高阿司匹林 RPR。S-血栓素 B2 水平非常低,且在具有高阿司匹林 RPR 或无高阿司匹林 RPR 的患者之间没有差异。高阿司匹林 RPR 的患者 vWF(124%比 100%,p<0.001,血小板计数(236×109/l 比 224×109/l,p=0.008),总 TFPI(68.4ng/ml 比 65.5ng/ml,p=0.005)和β-血栓球蛋白(β-TG)(33.3IU/ml 比 31.3IU/ml,p=0.041)的水平明显更高。与低阿司匹林 RPR 患者相比,两组之间在内源性凝血酶生成(ETP)、凝血酶原片段 1+2(F1+2)、D-二聚体、可溶性 TF(sTF)或 P-选择素(均 p>0.05)的水平上无显著差异。
PFA100®定义的高阿司匹林 RPR 似乎不是由于 ETP、sTF、F1+2 或 D-二聚体评估的凝血酶活性增加所致。血小板计数、β-TG、TFPI 和特别是 vWF 的升高水平可能解释了这些患者中内皮和血小板的激活增加。