Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Virol Methods. 2012 Nov;185(2):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Human enteroviruses (EVs) are the leading cause of CNS-associated disease in childhood. Identification of the EV types that patients are infected with is essential for monitoring outbreaks, the emergence of new types or variants, epidemiological surveillance and contributes to patient management. Rapid and sensitive molecular detection methods are frequently used to detect EVs/HPeVs directly from CSF. This requires that sensitive EV typing methods from CSF material need to be developed. In the present study two nested PCR-based typing assays were evaluated. The performance of the EV-A and -B specific nested PCR protocol and the Codehop-based PCR protocol were analyzed with several TCID(50)-titrated EV-A to D strains and 22 EV positive CSF samples. The EV-A and -B protocol was found to be more sensitive than the Codehop protocol. The Codehop protocol showed a high degree of aspecific amplification products when run on a gel, and required additional gel purification. The detection limit of the two protocols varied between the types, ranging from 0.1TCID(50)/mL sample to 10(6)TCID(50)/mL sample. From the 22 EV positive CSF samples, 15 (68%) samples were typed using either protocol. All samples were characterized as members of species B (E30 (9), CAV9 (2), E6 (1), E11 (1), E21 (1), E25 (1)). Three samples (E30 (2) and E25 (1)) could only be typed using the EV-B protocol. In this study, selected EV strains could be typed using both assays at low virus concentrations, typically found in CSF. However, the EV-A and -B protocol was more sensitive than the Codehop protocol for primary typing of CSF samples.
人肠道病毒(EVs)是儿童中枢神经系统相关疾病的主要病因。鉴定患者感染的 EV 类型对于监测暴发、新型或变异型的出现、流行病学监测以及有助于患者管理至关重要。通常使用快速且敏感的分子检测方法直接从 CSF 中检测 EV/HPeV。这就需要开发从 CSF 材料中检测 EV 的敏感分型方法。本研究评估了两种基于嵌套 PCR 的分型检测方法。分析了 EV-A 和 -B 特异性嵌套 PCR 方案和基于 Codehop 的 PCR 方案的性能,使用了几种 TCID(50)滴定的 EV-A 至 D 株和 22 份 EV 阳性 CSF 样本。发现 EV-A 和 -B 方案比 Codehop 方案更敏感。Codehop 方案在凝胶上显示出高度的非特异性扩增产物,需要额外的凝胶纯化。两种方案的检测限因类型而异,范围从 0.1TCID(50)/mL 样本至 10(6)TCID(50)/mL 样本。在 22 份 EV 阳性 CSF 样本中,使用两种方案中的任何一种均可对 15 份(68%)样本进行分型。所有样本均被鉴定为 B 种成员(E30(9)、CAV9(2)、E6(1)、E11(1)、E21(1)、E25(1))。三种样本(E30(2)和 E25(1))只能使用 EV-B 方案进行分型。在本研究中,选择的 EV 株在 CSF 中通常发现的低病毒浓度下,可使用两种检测方法进行分型。然而,对于 CSF 样本的初次分型,EV-A 和 -B 方案比 Codehop 方案更敏感。