Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94303, USA.
Neuroscience. 2012 Sep 27;221:151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether an objective measure of freezing of gait (FOG) using a validated alternating stepping in place (SIP) task, is related to executive and/or visuospatial cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD).
We studied prospectively 30 PD subjects with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III, the FOGq, Trail Making Test Part B (TMTB), Wisconsin Card Sorting, Initiation/Perseveration, Matrix Reasoning (MR) and Block Design (BD). PD subjects performed three, 100s trials of alternative SIP while standing on two force platforms to assess the number and duration of freezing episodes (FE), SIP rhythmicity and symmetry.
Freezers had larger cycle asymmetry and arrhythmicity than non-freezers (P<0.05). Performance on BD and MR tests differentiated freezers from non-freezers (P<0.04; P=0.001, respectively). BD performance negatively correlated with the FOGq total (P<0.05), the number and duration of FE (P<0.01), SIP arrhythmicity and asymmetry (P=0.01, P<0.05). MR performance negatively correlated with all FOGq #3 and total as well as SIP FE metrics (P≤0.01), except for SIP asymmetry.
Deficits in visuospatial perception and reasoning not in executive function differentiated freezers from non-freezers. Deficits in visuospatial processing negatively correlated with all SIP freeze metrics, whereas deficits in executive function were only correlated with SIP arrhythmicity, the FOGq total and the duration of freezing episodes. These results suggest that deficits in visuospatial processing to perform a motor task contribute to FOG and that different cognitive deficits may contribute to different aspects of freezing in PD. This is the first study to our knowledge that has compared metrics of freezing to cognitive tasks in the visuospatial and visual reasoning domains.
本研究旨在探讨使用经过验证的交替踏步(SIP)任务对冻结步态(FOG)进行客观测量,是否与帕金森病(PD)患者的执行和/或视空间认知障碍有关。
我们前瞻性研究了 30 名 PD 患者,使用统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)III、FOGq、连线测试 B(TMTB)、威斯康星卡片分类测试、启动/持续测试、矩阵推理(MR)和方块设计(BD)进行测试。PD 患者在两个力平台上站立时进行三次,每次 100s 的交替 SIP,以评估冻结发作(FE)的数量和持续时间、SIP 的节律性和对称性。
与非冻结者相比,冻结者的周期不对称性和节律性更大(P<0.05)。BD 和 MR 测试的表现将冻结者与非冻结者区分开来(P<0.04;P=0.001)。BD 表现与 FOGq 总分(P<0.05)、FE 的数量和持续时间(P<0.01)、SIP 节律性和不对称性(P=0.01,P<0.05)呈负相关。MR 表现与所有 FOGq #3 和总分以及 SIP FE 指标呈负相关(P≤0.01),除了 SIP 不对称性。
在执行功能之外,视空间感知和推理的缺陷将冻结者与非冻结者区分开来。视空间处理缺陷与所有 SIP 冻结指标呈负相关,而执行功能缺陷仅与 SIP 节律性、FOGq 总分和冻结发作的持续时间呈正相关。这些结果表明,在执行运动任务时视空间处理的缺陷导致 FOG,并且不同的认知缺陷可能导致 PD 中冻结的不同方面。这是我们所知的首次将冻结指标与视空间和视觉推理领域的认知任务进行比较的研究。