Suppr超能文献

联合免疫抑制比单药治疗更危险:哪些是事实,哪些是虚构?

Combined immunosuppression is more dangerous than monotherapy: what is fact and what is fiction?

机构信息

Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Dig Dis. 2012;30(4):404-7. doi: 10.1159/000338140. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

A number of immunosuppressants are used in the treatment of IBD. They have different modes of action but most of them affect different cell types and all are able to increase the number of infections, in particular opportunistic infections. Some may also lead to an increased number of malignomas. This is of particular importance in a disease such as Crohn's disease, which seems to be at least in part due to an immune deficiency. Data with regard to the differences of the effects of immunosuppressant combinations versus monotherapy are rare. Combinations with steroids, particularly, seem to pose a problem; however, an increased risk most probably also exists for other combinations. Therefore, in order to downregulate inflammation, we should use combined immunosuppression only if really necessary and only for short periods of time. The ultimate goal of the restitution of epithelial integrity and the maintenance of the mucosal barrier will better be achieved by other approaches.

摘要

有许多免疫抑制剂用于治疗 IBD。它们的作用模式不同,但大多数都会影响不同的细胞类型,而且所有的药物都能增加感染的数量,特别是机会性感染。一些药物也可能导致恶性肿瘤的数量增加。在像克罗恩病这样的疾病中,这一点尤为重要,因为这种疾病至少部分是由于免疫缺陷引起的。关于免疫抑制剂联合治疗与单药治疗效果差异的数据很少。与类固醇联合使用,尤其是有问题;然而,其他组合也很可能存在风险增加。因此,为了抑制炎症,我们只有在真正必要时才应使用联合免疫抑制治疗,而且时间应尽量短。通过其他方法,更好地实现上皮完整性的恢复和黏膜屏障的维持,将更好地达到治疗目的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验