Suppr超能文献

双侧苍白球内侧部脑深部电刺激联合丘脑腹外侧核切开术对脑瘫患者的影响。

The effect of bilateral globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation plus ventralis oralis thalamotomy on patients with cerebral palsy.

作者信息

Kim Joo Pyung, Chang Won Seok, Cho Sung-Rae, Chang Jin Woo

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(5):292-9. doi: 10.1159/000338093. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral GPi DBS plus ventralis oralis (Vo) thalamotomy to analyze the effect of the combined Vo thalamotomy.

METHODS

Between March 2003 and December 2008, 10 patients underwent DBS and/or Vo thalamotomy for treatment of cerebral palsy in our institute of neurosurgery and rehabilitation medicine. Four patients received bilateral posteroventral GPi DBS as group I and 6 patients received GPi DBS plus unilateral thalamotomy as group II.

RESULTS

The movement and disability scores of group I improved by 32 and 14.3%, respectively, at the last follow-up compared with baseline. The movement and disability scores of group II improved by 31.5 and 0.18%. The BFMDRS-movement subscores of group II demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the contralateral arm compared to group I (p = 0.042). Body pain, vitality and mental health seemed to improve in group II, in terms of health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our expectations, we were unable to demonstrate clear improvements in overall BFMDRS scores between group I and group II. However, movements of the contralateral upper extremities improved and health-related quality of life in group II showed satisfactory results.

摘要

目的

我们比较了双侧苍白球内侧部(GPi)脑深部电刺激(DBS)与双侧GPi DBS联合腹侧嘴部(Vo)丘脑切开术,以分析联合Vo丘脑切开术的效果。

方法

2003年3月至2008年12月期间,10例患者在我院神经外科和康复医学科接受了DBS和/或Vo丘脑切开术治疗脑瘫。4例患者接受双侧后腹侧GPi DBS作为第一组,6例患者接受GPi DBS联合单侧丘脑切开术作为第二组。

结果

与基线相比,第一组在最后一次随访时运动和残疾评分分别提高了32%和14.3%。第二组的运动和残疾评分分别提高了31.5%和0.18%。与第一组相比,第二组的BFMDRS运动子评分在对侧手臂上有统计学意义的改善(p = 0.042)。就健康相关生活质量而言,第二组的身体疼痛、活力和心理健康似乎有所改善。

结论

与我们的预期相反,我们未能证明第一组和第二组在总体BFMDRS评分上有明显改善。然而,第二组对侧上肢的运动有所改善,且健康相关生活质量显示出令人满意的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验