Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Brain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemoon-Gu 120-752, Seoul, Korea.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Dec;153(12):2319-27; discussion 2328. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1147-6. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
There is some debate about the effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) or lesioning on secondary dystonia. We applied a multimodal method to maximize the treatment effects of deep brain stimulation in patients with secondary dystonia.
Between March 2003 and January 2009, four patients underwent bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS and six patients underwent bilateral GPi DBS plus unilateral thalamotomy for treatment of cerebral palsy (CP). Among the patients with secondary dystonia without CP, five were also treated by DBS. We classified patients with generalized secondary dystonia with cerebral palsy into group I and patients with focal dystonia without CP into group II. Clinical outcome assessments were based on Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement and disability scores. Heath-related quality of life was assessed with a 36-item short-form general health survey questionnaire preoperatively and at the last follow-up.
The movement and disability scores of group I-A had improved by 32.0% (P = 0.285) and 14.3% (P = 0.593), respectively, at the last follow-up compared with baseline. The movement and disability scores of group I-B had improved by 31.5% and 0.18% at the last follow-up compared with baseline, respectively. In comparison with patients in group I-A, patients in group I-B showed a significant improvement in movement scores for the contralateral arm (P = 0.042). Group II patients showed a marked improvement in movement and disability scores of 77.7% (P = 0.039) and 80.0% (P = 0.041), respectively.
We demonstrated that DBS plus unilateral ventralis oralis thalamotomy for CP patients with fixed states in the upper extremities is useful not only to treat secondary dystonic movement but also to improve quality of life. In group II patients with post-traumatic dystonia and tardive dyskinesia, we achieved excellent clinical outcomes using a stereotactic procedure.
苍白球深部脑刺激(DBS)或损毁术对继发性肌张力障碍的影响存在一定争议。我们采用多模态方法,最大限度地提高继发性肌张力障碍患者的 DBS 治疗效果。
2003 年 3 月至 2009 年 1 月,4 例脑瘫患者行双侧苍白球 internus(GPi)DBS,6 例行双侧 GPi DBS 加单侧丘脑切开术治疗。5 例非脑瘫的继发性肌张力障碍患者也接受了 DBS 治疗。我们将脑瘫合并全身性继发性肌张力障碍患者分为 I 组,非脑瘫合并局灶性肌张力障碍患者分为 II 组。临床疗效评估采用 Burke-Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表的运动和残疾评分。术前和末次随访时采用 36 项简明健康调查问卷评估健康相关生活质量。
I-A 组的运动和残疾评分分别在末次随访时改善了 32.0%(P=0.285)和 14.3%(P=0.593),与基线相比。I-B 组的运动和残疾评分分别在末次随访时改善了 31.5%和 0.18%。与 I-A 组患者相比,I-B 组患者对侧上肢的运动评分明显改善(P=0.042)。II 组患者的运动和残疾评分分别显著改善了 77.7%(P=0.039)和 80.0%(P=0.041)。
我们证明了 DBS 加单侧腹侧口盖丘脑切开术治疗上肢固定状态的脑瘫患者不仅有助于治疗继发性肌张力障碍运动,还能改善生活质量。对于创伤后肌张力障碍和迟发性运动障碍的 II 组患者,我们采用立体定向手术获得了良好的临床效果。