Suppr超能文献

改善前列腺癌管理中决策制定并减少种族和民族差异的干预措施:系统评价。

Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted by prostate cancer (PCa) and are at risk for not receiving informed decision making (IDM). We conducted a systematic literature review on interventions to improve: (1) IDM about PCa in screening-eligible minority men, and (2) quality of life (QOL) in minority PCa survivors.

DATA SOURCES

MeSH headings for PCa, ethnic minorities, and interventions were searched in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We identified U.S.-based, English-language articles (1985 - 2010) on interventions to improve PCa IDM and QOL that included 50% or more minority patients or analyses stratified by race/ethnicity.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Articles (n = 19) were evaluated and scored for quality using a Downs and Black (DB) system. Interventions were organized by those enhancing 1) IDM about PCa screening and 2) improving QOL and symptom among PCa survivors. Outcomes were reported by intervention type (educational seminar, printed material, telephone-based, video and web-based).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies evaluated interventions for enhancing IDM about PCa screening and five evaluated programs to improve outcomes for PCa survivors. Knowledge scores were statistically significantly increased in 12 of 13 screening studies that measured knowledge, with ranges of effect varying across intervention types: educational programs (13% - 48% increase), print (11% - 18%), videotape/DVD (16%), and web-based (7% - 20%). In the final screening study, an intervention to improve decision-making about screening increased decisional self-efficacy by 9%. Five cognitive-behavioral interventions improved QOL among minority men being treated for localized PCa through enhancing problem solving and coping skills.

LIMITATIONS

Weak study designs, small sample sizes, selection biases, and variation in follow-up intervals across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational programs were the most effective intervention for improving knowledge among screening-eligible minority men. Cognitive behavioral strategies improved QOL for minority men treated for localized PCa.

摘要

目的

少数民族人群中前列腺癌(PCa)的发病率不成比例,并且存在未获得充分信息的决策制定(IDM)的风险。我们对旨在改善以下方面的干预措施进行了系统文献综述:(1)筛查合格的少数民族男性中关于 PCa 的 IDM,以及(2)少数民族 PCa 幸存者的生活质量(QOL)。

数据来源

在 MEDLINE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 中,使用前列腺癌、少数民族和干预措施的 MeSH 标题进行搜索。

受试者入选标准

我们确定了以美国为基础、以英语发表的(1985 年至 2010 年)关于改善 PCa IDM 和 QOL 的干预措施的文章,这些文章包括 50%或更多的少数民族患者,或按种族/族裔分层的分析。

研究评估和综合方法

使用 Downs 和 Black(DB)系统评估和评分文章(n=19)的质量。干预措施按以下方式组织:增强 1)关于 PCa 筛查的 IDM,2)改善 PCa 幸存者的 QOL 和症状。根据干预类型(教育研讨会、印刷材料、基于电话的、视频和基于网络的)报告结果。

结果

14 项研究评估了增强 PCa 筛查 IDM 的干预措施,5 项研究评估了改善 PCa 幸存者结局的方案。在 13 项测量知识的筛查研究中,有 12 项知识评分统计学上显著增加,不同干预类型的效果范围不同:教育计划(增加 13%至 48%)、印刷(增加 11%至 18%)、录像带/ DVD(增加 16%)和基于网络的(增加 7%至 20%)。在最后一项筛查研究中,一项改善关于筛查的决策制定的干预措施使决策自我效能提高了 9%。五项认知行为干预措施通过增强问题解决和应对技能,改善了接受局部 PCa 治疗的少数民族男性的生活质量。

局限性

研究设计薄弱、样本量小、选择偏倚以及研究之间随访间隔的差异。

结论

教育计划是改善筛查合格的少数民族男性知识的最有效干预措施。认知行为策略改善了接受局部 PCa 治疗的少数民族男性的生活质量。

相似文献

2
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
6
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
7
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
9
HIV prevention interventions to reduce racial disparities in the United States: a systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1047-67. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2036-2.
10
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Efficacy of decision aid delivery modes in prostate cancer screening: umbrella review and network meta-analysis.
BJU Int. 2025 Feb;135(2):222-234. doi: 10.1111/bju.16545. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
7
Quality of Life Among Black Prostate Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review.
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1648-1664. doi: 10.1177/1557988318780857. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Tumor Grade Among Black Men with Prostate Cancer.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Feb;110(1):53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Harnessing Implementation Science to Increase the Impact of Health Equity Research.
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 9 2):S16-S23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000769.

本文引用的文献

3
The shared decision-making continuum.
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):903-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208.
5
Increasing prostate cancer screening among African American men.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3 Suppl):91-106. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0366.
6
Cancer statistics, 2010.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
8
Managing uncertainty about treatment decision making in early stage prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):349-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验