• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善前列腺癌管理中决策制定并减少种族和民族差异的干预措施:系统评价。

Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5
PMID:22798216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3403148/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ethnic minorities are disproportionately impacted by prostate cancer (PCa) and are at risk for not receiving informed decision making (IDM). We conducted a systematic literature review on interventions to improve: (1) IDM about PCa in screening-eligible minority men, and (2) quality of life (QOL) in minority PCa survivors.

DATA SOURCES

MeSH headings for PCa, ethnic minorities, and interventions were searched in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. SUBJECT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We identified U.S.-based, English-language articles (1985 - 2010) on interventions to improve PCa IDM and QOL that included 50% or more minority patients or analyses stratified by race/ethnicity.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Articles (n = 19) were evaluated and scored for quality using a Downs and Black (DB) system. Interventions were organized by those enhancing 1) IDM about PCa screening and 2) improving QOL and symptom among PCa survivors. Outcomes were reported by intervention type (educational seminar, printed material, telephone-based, video and web-based).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies evaluated interventions for enhancing IDM about PCa screening and five evaluated programs to improve outcomes for PCa survivors. Knowledge scores were statistically significantly increased in 12 of 13 screening studies that measured knowledge, with ranges of effect varying across intervention types: educational programs (13% - 48% increase), print (11% - 18%), videotape/DVD (16%), and web-based (7% - 20%). In the final screening study, an intervention to improve decision-making about screening increased decisional self-efficacy by 9%. Five cognitive-behavioral interventions improved QOL among minority men being treated for localized PCa through enhancing problem solving and coping skills.

LIMITATIONS

Weak study designs, small sample sizes, selection biases, and variation in follow-up intervals across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational programs were the most effective intervention for improving knowledge among screening-eligible minority men. Cognitive behavioral strategies improved QOL for minority men treated for localized PCa.

摘要

目的

少数民族人群中前列腺癌(PCa)的发病率不成比例,并且存在未获得充分信息的决策制定(IDM)的风险。我们对旨在改善以下方面的干预措施进行了系统文献综述:(1)筛查合格的少数民族男性中关于 PCa 的 IDM,以及(2)少数民族 PCa 幸存者的生活质量(QOL)。

数据来源

在 MEDLINE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 中,使用前列腺癌、少数民族和干预措施的 MeSH 标题进行搜索。

受试者入选标准

我们确定了以美国为基础、以英语发表的(1985 年至 2010 年)关于改善 PCa IDM 和 QOL 的干预措施的文章,这些文章包括 50%或更多的少数民族患者,或按种族/族裔分层的分析。

研究评估和综合方法

使用 Downs 和 Black(DB)系统评估和评分文章(n=19)的质量。干预措施按以下方式组织:增强 1)关于 PCa 筛查的 IDM,2)改善 PCa 幸存者的 QOL 和症状。根据干预类型(教育研讨会、印刷材料、基于电话的、视频和基于网络的)报告结果。

结果

14 项研究评估了增强 PCa 筛查 IDM 的干预措施,5 项研究评估了改善 PCa 幸存者结局的方案。在 13 项测量知识的筛查研究中,有 12 项知识评分统计学上显著增加,不同干预类型的效果范围不同:教育计划(增加 13%至 48%)、印刷(增加 11%至 18%)、录像带/ DVD(增加 16%)和基于网络的(增加 7%至 20%)。在最后一项筛查研究中,一项改善关于筛查的决策制定的干预措施使决策自我效能提高了 9%。五项认知行为干预措施通过增强问题解决和应对技能,改善了接受局部 PCa 治疗的少数民族男性的生活质量。

局限性

研究设计薄弱、样本量小、选择偏倚以及研究之间随访间隔的差异。

结论

教育计划是改善筛查合格的少数民族男性知识的最有效干预措施。认知行为策略改善了接受局部 PCa 治疗的少数民族男性的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.改善前列腺癌管理中决策制定并减少种族和民族差异的干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5.
2
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.针对成年少数民族群体,通过有针对性的大众媒体干预措施来促进健康行为,以降低非传染性疾病风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
5
Cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment interventions for racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.针对少数民族的宫颈癌筛查、诊断和治疗干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1016-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2052-2.
6
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
7
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
8
Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.改善少数民族与结直肠癌相关的护理干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1033-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2044-2.
9
HIV prevention interventions to reduce racial disparities in the United States: a systematic review.减少美国种族差异的艾滋病毒预防干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1047-67. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2036-2.
10
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-identification of Pelvic Floor Disorder Symptoms Among Latina Women: The Roles of Knowledge, Attitude, Behaviors, Beliefs, and Psychosocial Factors.拉丁裔女性盆底功能障碍症状的自我识别:知识、态度、行为、信念和社会心理因素的作用
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02421-w.
2
Efficacy of decision aid delivery modes in prostate cancer screening: umbrella review and network meta-analysis.决策辅助工具交付模式在前列腺癌筛查中的疗效:伞形综述与网状Meta分析
BJU Int. 2025 Feb;135(2):222-234. doi: 10.1111/bju.16545. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Mining the health disparities and minority health bibliome: A computational scoping review and gap analysis of 200,000+ articles.挖掘健康差异和少数民族健康文献库:对 20 多万篇文章进行计算范围综述和差距分析。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jan 26;10(4):eadf9033. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf9033. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
Mining the Health Disparities and Minority Health Bibliome: A Computational Scoping Review and Gap Analysis of 200,000+ Articles.挖掘健康差异与少数族裔健康文献库:对200,000余篇文章的计算性综述与差距分析
medRxiv. 2023 Oct 17:2023.10.17.23296754. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.17.23296754.
5
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: Progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives for 4 common cancers.国家癌症报告:第二部分——4 种常见癌症实现 2020 年健康目标的进展。
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2250-2266. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32801. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the computer-based prostate Cancer screening decision aid acceptance scale for African-American men.基于计算机的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具接受度量表的开发及初步心理计量学评估:面向非裔美国男性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0776-y.
7
Quality of Life Among Black Prostate Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review.黑人前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量:一项综合综述。
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1648-1664. doi: 10.1177/1557988318780857. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
A complex culturally targeted intervention to reduce Hispanic disparities in living kidney donor transplantation: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study protocol.一项旨在减少西班牙裔活体肾移植差异的复杂文化针对性干预措施:一项有效性-实施混合研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 16;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3151-5.
9
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Tumor Grade Among Black Men with Prostate Cancer.社会经济地位与黑人前列腺癌患者肿瘤分级的关系。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Feb;110(1):53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Harnessing Implementation Science to Increase the Impact of Health Equity Research.利用实施科学提高健康公平研究的影响力。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 9 2):S16-S23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000769.

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized decision-making for older men with prostate cancer: balancing cancer control with treatment consequences across the clinical spectrum.为老年前列腺癌男性进行个体化决策:在整个临床谱上平衡癌症控制与治疗后果。
Semin Oncol. 2011 Apr;38(2):309-25. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.01.011.
2
A community-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among Hispanic American men changed knowledge and role preferences: a cluster RCT.一项基于社区的干预措施,旨在促进西班牙裔美国男性对前列腺癌筛查的知情决策:一项群组 RCT 研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):e44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.033. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
3
The shared decision-making continuum.共同决策连续体。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):903-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208.
4
Supporting informed decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing on the web: an online randomized controlled trial.在网络上支持关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的明智决策:一项在线随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 6;12(3):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1305.
5
Increasing prostate cancer screening among African American men.增加非裔美国男性的前列腺癌筛查。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3 Suppl):91-106. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0366.
6
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
7
A church-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.基于教堂的干预措施,以促进非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌筛查的知情决策。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):164-71. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30521-6.
8
Managing uncertainty about treatment decision making in early stage prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial.管理早期前列腺癌治疗决策中的不确定性:一项随机临床试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):349-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
9
A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men.一项针对参加教会活动的非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌筛查知情决策的基于精神层面和非基于精神层面的教育干预措施的比较。
Urol Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):249-58.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.