Suppr超能文献

基于教堂的干预措施,以促进非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌筛查的知情决策。

A church-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 660 S Euclid, Campus, Box 8100, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):164-71. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30521-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This feasibility study developed and pilot tested an intervention to: (1) increase knowledge about prostate cancer screening; and (2) promote self-efficacy to participate in the informed decision-making process.

SETTING

African American men are a priority audience for prostate cancer screening interventions to promote informed decision making, and faith-based settings have been shown to be an effective venue to reach this population. Therefore we used predominantly African American churches to develop and test our intervention.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (N = 73) were recruited, and the intervention was administered by an African American health educator.

INTERVENTION

We developed and pretested a prostate cancer screening informed decision-making intervention based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the health belief model. The intervention included a tool called the "road map," which depicts the potential consequences of a decision to undergo or forgo screening. A quasiexperimental design was used to test the intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were change in knowledge and self-efficacy post intervention.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer knowledge (p < .0001) and self-efficacy (p = .025) significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

A church-based intervention delivered by an African American health educator is a promising strategy for promoting informed decision making among African American men.

摘要

目的

本可行性研究旨在开发并初步测试一种干预措施,以:(1)提高对前列腺癌筛查的认识;(2)增强参与知情决策过程的自我效能感。

背景

在促进知情决策方面,非裔美国男性是前列腺癌筛查干预的重点目标人群,而基于信仰的环境已被证明是接触这一人群的有效场所。因此,我们主要利用非裔美国教堂来开发和测试我们的干预措施。

参与者

招募了 73 名参与者,并由一名非裔美籍健康教育者来实施干预措施。

干预措施

我们根据渥太华决策支持框架和健康信念模型开发并预测试了一种前列腺癌筛查知情决策干预措施。该干预措施包括一个名为“路线图”的工具,它描绘了决定进行或放弃筛查的潜在后果。采用准实验设计来测试干预措施。

主要结果测量指标

主要结果测量指标是干预后的知识和自我效能的变化。

结果

前列腺癌知识(p<0.0001)和自我效能(p=0.025)显著提高。

结论

由非裔美籍健康教育者在教堂中提供的干预措施是促进非裔美国男性知情决策的有前途的策略。

相似文献

3
4
Can Women Facilitate Men's Prostate Cancer Screening Informed Decision-Making? The M-PACT Trial.
J Health Commun. 2017 Dec;22(12):964-973. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1382616. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of an Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Self-Efficacy Scale for African-American Men.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Aug;7(4):746-759. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00702-0. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
6
Facilitating Shared Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening Among African American Men.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan;43(1):86-92. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.86-92.
8
Addressing the challenge of informed decision making in prostate cancer community outreach to African American men.
Am J Mens Health. 2011 Nov;5(6):508-16. doi: 10.1177/1557988311411909. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
A computer-tailored intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.
Am J Mens Health. 2009 Dec;3(4):340-51. doi: 10.1177/1557988308325460. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
10
Leveraging the Family Influence of Women in Prostate Cancer Efforts Targeting African American Men.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Aug;5(4):820-830. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0427-0. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

2
Germline testing for prostate cancer: current state and opportunities for enhanced access.
EBioMedicine. 2025 Jun;116:105705. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105705. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6.
5
Development of a Ramayana-based Counseling Module for Persons with Common Mental Health Disorders.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 May 24:02537176241245073. doi: 10.1177/02537176241245073.
7
Effect of Prostate Cancer Education on Saudi Men: Knowledge, Beliefs, and Screening Intentions.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jul 1;25(7):2439-2444. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.7.2439.
9
Ottawa Decision Support Framework to Improve Iranian Nurses' Decision Coaching Skills.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;26(2):199-203. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24106.

本文引用的文献

2
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
4
Racial differences in prostate cancer screening by family history.
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;18(7):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
Health information styles among participants in a prostate cancer screening informed decision-making intervention.
Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):440-53. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn011. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
6
A structural approach to examining prostate cancer risk for rural southern African American men.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007 Nov;18(4 Suppl):73-101. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2007.0121.
7
Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.030.
9
African-American men's perceptions about prostate cancer: implications for designing educational interventions.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(11):2189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
10
Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:213-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验