Dong Wen-wen, Tian Yang-hua, Wei Ling, Wang Kai
Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Mar 6;92(9):612-5.
To explore the attentional bias in unilateral spatial neglect (USN) patients.
The grey discriminant test was conducted on 12 right-brain-damaged patients with USN (USN+), 12 right-brain-damaged patients with no evidence of USN (USN-) and 20 health controls (HC). They were matched for age, years of education, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores and handedness. And all patients were recruited from First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The attentional deviation scores were compared between three groups.
The differences in scores of neglect tests for the USN+, USN- and HC groups were significant (Albert test: USN+ group -0.56 ± 0.39, USN- group 0.00 ± 0.00, HC group 0.00 ± 0.00, F((2, 41)) = 33.708, P < 0.001; line bisection test: USN+ group 0.28 ± 0.29, USN- group 0.03 ± 0.04, HC group -0.02 ± 0.04, F((2, 41)) = 14.527, P < 0.001; clock drawing by memory: USN+ group 3.58 ± 4.03, USN- group 0.08 ± 0.29, HC group 0.00 ± 0.00, F((2, 41)) = 12.558, P < 0.001; daisy copying: USN+ group 0.83 ± 0.65, USN- group 0.13 ± 0.23, HC group 0.00 ± 0.00, F((2, 41)) = 21.621, P < 0.001). The comparative results of lesion locations showed that USN+ patients were predominantly related to lesions in temporal-parietal junction. The attentional deviation scores for the USN+, USN- and HC groups were 0.92 ± 0.11, 0.41 ± 0.12 and -0.28 ± 0.15 respectively. The difference was significant (F((2, 41)) = 334.324, P < 0.001). There was with a small leftward bias in the HC group and a rightward bias in the USN+ and USN- groups. LSD test revealed that the USN+ group displayed a rightward bias much strongly than the USN- group (P < 0.001). And the results of grey discriminant test were consistent with the neglect symptoms.
The USN patients show a marked attentional bias toward the right side of space. And it may be attributed to the dysfunction of temporal-parietal junction.
探讨单侧空间忽视(USN)患者的注意偏向。
对12例患有USN的右脑损伤患者(USN+)、12例无USN证据的右脑损伤患者(USN-)和20名健康对照者(HC)进行灰度辨别测试。他们在年龄、受教育年限、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分和利手方面相匹配。所有患者均来自安徽医科大学第一附属医院。比较三组之间的注意偏差得分。
USN+组、USN-组和HC组在忽视测试得分上存在显著差异(阿尔伯特测试:USN+组-0.56±0.39,USN-组0.00±0.00,HC组0.00±0.00,F((2, 41)) = 33.708,P < 0.001;直线二等分测试:USN+组0.28±0.29,USN-组0.03±0.04,HC组-0.02±0.04,F((2, 41)) = 14.527,P < 0.001;记忆画钟:USN+组3.58±4.03,USN-组0.08±0.29,HC组0.00±0.00,F((2, 41)) = 12.558,P < 0.001;雏菊临摹:USN+组0.83±0.65,USN-组0.13±0.23,HC组0.00±0.00,F((2, 41)) = 21.621,P < 0.001)。病变部位的比较结果显示,USN+患者主要与颞顶叶交界处的病变有关。USN+组、USN-组和HC组的注意偏差得分分别为0.92±0.11、0.41±0.12和-0.28±0.15。差异显著(F((2, 41)) = 334.324,P < 0.001)。HC组存在轻微的向左偏向,USN+组和USN-组存在向右偏向。LSD检验显示,USN+组的向右偏向比USN-组强烈得多(P < 0.001)。灰度辨别测试结果与忽视症状一致。
USN患者对空间右侧表现出明显的注意偏向。这可能归因于颞顶叶交界处的功能障碍。