National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Waterfront Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Fish Biol. 2012 Jul;81(2):766-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03372.x.
Otolith microchemistry can provide valuable information about stock structure and mixing patterns when the magnitude of environmental differences among areas is greater than the cumulative influence of any vital effects. Here, the current understanding of the underlying mechanisms governing element incorporation into the otolith is reviewed. Hard and soft acid and base (HSAB) theory is employed to explore the differences in chemical behaviours, distributions and affinities between elements. Hard acid cations (e.g. Mg(2+) , Li(+) and Ba(2+) ) tend to be less physiologically influenced and accepted more readily into the otolith crystal lattice but are relatively homogeneous in seawater. Soft acid cations (e.g. Zn(2+) and Cu(2+) ) on the other hand, exhibit more varied distributions in seawater, but are more likely to be bound to blood proteins and less available for uptake into the otolith. The factors influencing the geographical distribution of elements in the sea, and their incorporation into the otoliths of marine fishes are reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on examining physiological processes, including gonad development, on the uptake of elements commonly used in population studies, notably Sr. Finally, case studies are presented that either directly or indirectly compare population structuring or movements inferred by otolith elemental fingerprints with the patterns indicated by additional, alternative proxies. The main obstacle currently limiting the application of otolith elemental microchemistry to infer movements of marine fishes appears to lie in the largely homogeneous distribution of those elements most reliably measured in the otolith. Evolving technologies will improve the discriminatory power of otolith chemistry by allowing measurement of spatially explicit, low level elements; however, for the time being, the combination of otolith minor and trace element fingerprints with alternative proxies and stable isotopic ratios can greatly extend the scope of migration studies. Among the otolith elements that routinely occur above instrument detection limits, Ba, Mn and Li were deemed the most likely to prove reliable geographic markers in marine species.
耳石微化学可以提供有价值的信息,关于种群结构和混合模式,当环境差异的幅度大于任何生命效应的累积影响时。在这里,目前对控制元素纳入耳石的潜在机制的理解进行了回顾。硬酸和软酸(HSAB)理论被用来探索元素在化学行为、分布和亲和力之间的差异。硬酸阳离子(例如 Mg(2+)、Li(+)和 Ba(2+))往往受到的生理影响较小,更容易进入耳石晶格,但在海水中相对均匀。另一方面,软酸阳离子(例如 Zn(2+)和 Cu(2+))在海水中分布更为多样,但更有可能与血液蛋白结合,不太可能被吸收到耳石中。影响元素在海洋中的地理分布及其纳入海洋鱼类耳石的因素进行了回顾。特别强调检查生理过程,包括性腺发育,对通常用于种群研究的元素的吸收,特别是 Sr。最后,提出了一些案例研究,这些案例研究直接或间接地比较了耳石元素指纹推断的种群结构或运动与其他替代示踪剂所指示的模式。目前,限制耳石元素微化学应用于推断海洋鱼类运动的主要障碍似乎在于那些在耳石中最可靠测量的元素的分布在很大程度上是均匀的。不断发展的技术将通过允许测量空间上明确的低水平元素来提高耳石化学的辨别力;然而,目前,耳石微量元素和痕量元素指纹与替代示踪剂和稳定同位素比值的结合可以极大地扩展迁移研究的范围。在耳石中经常出现的元素中,Ba、Mn 和 Li 被认为是最有可能在海洋物种中成为可靠地理标记的元素。