• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在机器人手术中触觉反馈工具振动的系统的体内验证。

In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, 144 Towne Building, 220 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):656-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2452-8. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2452-8
PMID:22806517
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) lacks the haptic (kinesthetic and tactile) cues that surgeons are accustomed to receiving in open and laparoscopic surgery. We previously introduced a method for adding tactile and audio feedback of tool vibrations to RMIS systems, creating sensations similar to what one feels and hears when using a laparoscopic tool. Our prior work showed that surgeons performing box-trainer tasks significantly preferred having this feedback and believed that it helped them concentrate on the task, but we did not know how well our approach would work in a clinically relevant setting. This study constituted the first in vivo test of our system.

METHODS

Accelerometers that measure tool vibrations were mounted to the patient-side manipulators of a da Vinci S surgical system. The measured vibrations were recorded and presented to the surgeon through vibrotactile and audio channels while two transperitoneal nephrectomies and two mid-ureteral dissections with uretero-ureterostomy were completed on a porcine model. We examined 30 minutes of resulting video to identify and tag manipulation events, aiming to determine whether our system can measure significant and meaningful tool vibrations during in vivo procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 1,404 manipulation events were identified. Analysis of each event's accelerations indicated that 82 % of these events resulted in significant vibrations. The magnitude of the accelerations measured for different manipulation events varied widely, with hard contact causing the largest cues.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of providing tool vibration feedback during in vivo RMIS. Significant tool vibrations were reliably measured for the majority of events during standard urological procedures on a porcine model, while real-time, naturalistic tactile and audio tool vibration feedback was provided to the surgeon. The feedback system's modules were easily implemented outside the sterile field of the da Vinci S and did not interfere with the surgical procedure.

摘要

背景

机器人微创手术 (RMIS) 缺乏外科医生在开放式和腹腔镜手术中习惯接收的触觉(运动觉和触觉)提示。我们之前介绍了一种为 RMIS 系统添加工具振动触觉和音频反馈的方法,从而产生类似于使用腹腔镜工具时所感觉到和听到的感觉。我们之前的工作表明,执行盒式训练任务的外科医生非常喜欢这种反馈,并认为这有助于他们专注于任务,但我们不知道我们的方法在临床相关环境中的效果如何。这项研究是我们系统的首次体内测试。

方法

将测量工具振动的加速度计安装到达芬奇 S 手术系统的患者侧操作器上。测量到的振动被记录下来,并通过振动触觉和音频通道呈现给外科医生,同时在猪模型上完成了两次经腹腔肾切除术和两次中段输尿管切开术及输尿管-输尿管吻合术。我们检查了 30 分钟的视频,以识别和标记操作事件,旨在确定我们的系统是否可以在体内手术过程中测量到重要且有意义的工具振动。

结果

共识别出 1404 个操作事件。对每个事件的加速度进行分析表明,其中 82%的事件产生了明显的振动。不同操作事件的加速度测量值差异很大,硬接触会产生最大的提示。

结论

这项研究证明了在体内 RMIS 中提供工具振动反馈的可行性。在猪模型上进行的标准泌尿科手术过程中,大多数事件都可靠地测量到明显的工具振动,同时为外科医生提供了实时、自然的触觉和音频工具振动反馈。反馈系统的模块易于在达芬奇 S 的无菌区域外实施,且不会干扰手术过程。

相似文献

1
In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.在机器人手术中触觉反馈工具振动的系统的体内验证。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):656-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2452-8. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
2
Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery.外科医生和非外科医生在机器人手术过程中更喜欢器械振动的触觉反馈。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2970-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4030-8. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
3
AiroTouch: enhancing telerobotic assembly through naturalistic haptic feedback of tool vibrations.AiroTouch:通过工具振动的自然触觉反馈增强远程机器人装配。
Front Robot AI. 2024 May 21;11:1355205. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1355205. eCollection 2024.
4
Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.机器人辅助微创手术中的触觉反馈
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831a478c.
5
Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model.使用动物模型评估机器人手术中触觉反馈在潜在临床应用中的情况。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3198-209. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4602-2. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
Cutaneous Feedback of Fingertip Deformation and Vibration for Palpation in Robotic Surgery.用于机器人手术触诊的指尖变形和振动的皮肤反馈
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Feb;63(2):278-87. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2455932. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback.机器人手术中的触觉反馈人工触诊。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1252-1259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6405-8. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Tool Contact Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery.远程机器人手术中的工具接触力反馈
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2011 May-Jun;4(3):210-20. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2011.31.
9
Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery.远程机器人手术中的触觉反馈增强。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Mar;15(3):515-529. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02118-x. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
10
A review of haptic feedback in tele-operated robotic surgery.远程操控机器人手术中的触觉反馈综述。
J Med Eng Technol. 2020 Jul;44(5):247-254. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2020.1772391. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation training with haptic feedback of instrument vibrations reduces resident workload during live robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.在实时机器人辅助袖状胃切除术期间,带有器械振动触觉反馈的模拟训练可减轻住院医师的工作量。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1523-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11459-6. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
How to determine hands' vibration perception thresholds - a systematic review.如何确定手部振动感觉阈值——一项系统综述
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02534-w.
3
A Cylindrical Grip Type of Tactile Device Using Magneto-Responsive Materials Integrated with Surgical Robot Console: Design and Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Tactile Feedback Induces Reduced Grasping Force in Robot-Assisted Surgery.触觉反馈可降低机器人辅助手术中的抓握力。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2009 Apr-Jun;2(2):103-110. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2009.4. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
2
Tool Contact Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery.远程机器人手术中的工具接触力反馈
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2011 May-Jun;4(3):210-20. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2011.31.
3
Technological advances in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的技术进展。
一种基于磁响应材料的圆柱形手柄式触觉装置与手术机器人控制台集成:设计与分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 30;22(3):1085. doi: 10.3390/s22031085.
4
Perspective on the integration of optical sensing into orthopedic surgical devices.对将光学传感技术融入骨科手术设备的展望。
J Biomed Opt. 2022 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.1.010601.
5
Effect of Short-Term Exposure to Supplemental Vibrotactile Kinesthetic Feedback on Goal-Directed Movements after Stroke: A Proof of Concept Case Series.短期补充振动触觉动觉反馈对脑卒中后目标导向运动的影响:概念验证病例系列。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;21(4):1519. doi: 10.3390/s21041519.
6
A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery.一种用于在实时机器人手术期间记录器械交互的实用系统。
J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0399-y. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
7
Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams.机器人手术对外科团队决策的影响:外科团队的观点。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1057-66. eCollection 2015.
8
Use of stochastic resonance methods for improving laparoscopic surgery performance.使用随机共振方法提高腹腔镜手术性能。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4214-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4730-8. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
9
MR-compatible biopsy needle with enhanced tip force sensing.具有增强尖端力感测功能的磁共振兼容活检针。
World Haptics Conf. 2013 Apr;2013:109-114. doi: 10.1109/WHC.2013.6548393.
10
The brain uses extrasomatic information to estimate limb displacement.大脑利用体外信息来估计肢体位移。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1661.
Urol Clin North Am. 2009 May;36(2):237-49, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.02.010.
4
Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks.在物体操纵任务中指尖触觉信号的编码与运用。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 May;10(5):345-59. doi: 10.1038/nrn2621. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
5
The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.触觉反馈在传统及机器人辅助微创手术和虚拟现实训练中的价值:当前综述
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1180-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x. Epub 2009 Jan 1.
6
Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.机器人辅助微创手术中的触觉反馈
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831a478c.
7
Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.妇科肿瘤学中的微创手术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2 Suppl):S29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.025. Epub 2008 Aug 31.
8
Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback.使用增强视觉反馈的强化机器人手术训练。
Surg Innov. 2008 Mar;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1177/1553350608315953.
9
Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery.视觉线索在机器人手术中充当触觉反馈的替代品。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jun;22(6):1505-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9683-0. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
10
Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?外科医生能同时通过触觉进行思考和操作吗?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1564-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0279-8. Epub 2007 Aug 21.