Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):696-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2468-0. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
The authors are grateful for the interesting perspectives given by Buchs and colleagues in their letter to the editor entitled "3D Laparoscopy: A Step Toward Advanced Surgical Navigation." Shutter-based 3D video systems failed to become established in the operating room in the late 1990s. To strengthen the starting conditions of the new 3D technology using better monitors and high definition, the authors give suggestions for its practical use in the clinical routine. But first they list the characteristics of single-channeled and bichanneled 3D laparoscopes and describe stereoscopic terms such as "comfort zone," "stereoscopic window," and "near-point distance." The authors believe it would be helpful to have the 3D pioneers assemble and share their experiences with these suggestions. Although this letter discusses "laparoscopy," it would also be interesting to collect experiences from other surgical disciplines, especially when one is considering whether to opt for bi- or single-channeled optics.
作者感谢 Buchs 及其同事在题为“3D 腹腔镜：迈向高级手术导航的一步”的来信中提出的有趣观点。基于快门的 3D 视频系统在 20 世纪 90 年代末未能在手术室中立足。为了通过更好的监视器和高清技术来增强新 3D 技术的启动条件，作者为其在临床常规中的实际应用提出了建议。但首先，他们列出了单通道和双通道 3D 腹腔镜的特点，并描述了立体术语，如“舒适区”、“立体窗口”和“近点距离”。作者认为，让 3D 技术的先驱者们汇集并分享他们的经验，这将是有帮助的。尽管这封信讨论的是“腹腔镜”，但收集来自其他外科领域的经验也将很有趣，特别是当人们考虑是否选择双通道或单通道光学设备时。
