• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Surgical wound management made easier and more cost-effective.手术伤口管理变得更轻松且更具成本效益。
Oncol Lett. 2012 Jul;4(1):97-100. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.687. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
2
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
3
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.预防手术部位感染的敷料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 20;12(12):CD003091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003091.pub4.
4
A randomized controlled trial on the effect of a silver carboxymethylcellulose dressing on surgical site infections after breast cancer surgery.一项关于银羧甲基纤维素敷料对乳腺癌手术后手术部位感染影响的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195715. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.随机分为使用封闭敷料和纱布敷料的手术患者的局部伤口护理家庭护理成本比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(5):593-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02032.x.
6
Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.手术患者局部伤口护理使用封闭敷料与纱布敷料的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):950-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.950.
7
Application time for postoperative wound dressing following breast augmentation with implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.植入式隆胸术后伤口敷料的应用时间:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0529-5.
8
Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds.清洁及清洁-污染手术切口一期缝合后早期与延迟拆除敷料的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD010259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259.pub3.
9
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.预防手术部位感染的敷料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 1(9):CD003091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003091.pub3.
10
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.《手术部位感染预防指南》,1999年。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)医院感染控制实践咨询委员会。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin and Wound Healing: Conventional Dosage versus Nanobased Emulsions Forms.皮肤与伤口愈合:传统剂型与纳米乳液剂型对比
ACS Omega. 2025 Mar 28;10(13):12837-12855. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c00455. eCollection 2025 Apr 8.
2
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Conventional Dressing in Lower Limb Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗与传统敷料用于下肢骨折的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 15;12(5):e5806. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005806. eCollection 2024 May.
3
A review on wound management strategies in enhanced recovery after craniotomy: An in-depth analysis of their influence on patient recovery and surgical outcomes.开颅术后加速康复中的伤口管理策略综述:对其对患者康复及手术结局影响的深入分析
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14595. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14595.
4
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Clean Pediatric Surgical Procedures: A Necessity or Redundancy?清洁小儿外科手术中的抗菌预防:必要还是多余?
Cureus. 2020 Sep 28;12(9):e10701. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10701.
5
Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.寻求治疗复杂伤口的有效干预措施:系统评价综述
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 22;13:89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0288-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review.厘清知识转移中的概念:一项文献综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(6):691-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03775.x.
2
Innovation in healthcare: a systematic review of recent research.医疗保健领域的创新:近期研究的系统综述
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):66-72; discussion 65. doi: 10.1177/0894318405284129.
3
Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management.伤口床准备:一种系统的伤口管理方法。
Wound Repair Regen. 2003 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S1-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x.
4
Nurses' views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: results of a national survey.护士对换药时疼痛和创伤的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
J Wound Care. 2000 Sep;9(8):369-73. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2000.9.8.26282.
5
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.《手术部位感染预防指南》,1999年。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)医院感染控制实践咨询委员会。
Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.
6
Clinical benefit of a hydrocolloid dressing in closed surgical wounds.水胶体敷料对闭合性手术伤口的临床益处。
J ET Nurs. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2):68-72. doi: 10.1097/00152192-199303000-00013.

手术伤口管理变得更轻松且更具成本效益。

Surgical wound management made easier and more cost-effective.

作者信息

Akagi Ichiro, Furukawa Kiyonori, Miyashita Masao, Kiyama Teruo, Matsuda Akihisa, Nomura Tsutomu, Makino Hiroshi, Hagiwara Nobutoshi, Takahashi Ken, Uchida Eiji

机构信息

Division of Surgery for Organ Function and Biological Regulation, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2012 Jul;4(1):97-100. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.687. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2012.687
PMID:22807970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3398356/
Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) have been published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to these guidelines, a wound should usually be covered with a sterile dressing for 24 to 48 h when a surgical incision is closed primarily. However, it is not recommended that an incision be covered by a dressing beyond 48 h. In this study, patients were stratified into two groups for analysis: patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until postoperative day 7 (7POD; group A); and patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until 2POD (group B). We evaluated the incidence of SSI, nursing hours and cost implications. The results showed that there was no significant difference in SSI occurrence between the two groups (group A, 10% vs. group B, 7.3%). By contrast, the average nursing time differed by 2.8 min (group A, 3.8 min vs. group B, 0.9 min). The material costs per patient were also reduced by $14.70 (group A, $61.80 vs. group B, $47.10). In conclusion, we applied our knowledge of the evidence-based CDC guidelines to determine whether 48-h wound management can be made easier, more uniform and more cost-effective compared to conventional wound management. The results of the present study showed that surgical wound management methods can be more convenient and inexpensive.

摘要

美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)已发布了预防手术部位感染(SSI)的循证指南。根据这些指南,当手术切口一期缝合时,伤口通常应使用无菌敷料覆盖24至48小时。然而,不建议在48小时后仍用敷料覆盖切口。在本研究中,患者被分为两组进行分析:手术伤口消毒且每天更换一次纱布直至术后第7天(7POD;A组)的患者;以及手术伤口消毒且每天更换一次纱布直至术后第2天(B组)的患者。我们评估了SSI的发生率、护理时长和成本影响。结果显示,两组之间SSI的发生率无显著差异(A组为10%,B组为7.3%)。相比之下,平均护理时间相差2.8分钟(A组为3.8分钟,B组为0.9分钟)。每位患者的材料成本也降低了14.70美元(A组为61.80美元,B组为47.10美元)。总之,我们运用循证CDC指南的知识来确定与传统伤口管理相比,48小时的伤口管理是否可以更轻松、更统一且更具成本效益。本研究结果表明,手术伤口管理方法可以更便捷且成本更低。