• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标方面的年龄差异:检验来自选择、优化与补偿理论以及社会情感选择理论的预测。

Age-related differences in goals: testing predictions from selection, optimization, and compensation theory and socioemotional selectivity theory.

作者信息

Penningroth Suzanna L, Scott Walter D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2012;74(2):87-111. doi: 10.2190/AG.74.2.a.

DOI:10.2190/AG.74.2.a
PMID:22808622
Abstract

Two prominent theories of lifespan development, socioemotional selectivity theory and selection, optimization, and compensation theory, make similar predictions for differences in the goal representations of younger and older adults. Our purpose was to test whether the goals of younger and older adults differed in ways predicted by these two theories. Older adults and two groups of younger adults (college students and non-students) listed their current goals, which were then coded by independent raters. Observed age group differences in goals generally supported both theories. Specifically, when compared to younger adults, older adults reported more goals focused on maintenance/loss prevention, the present, emotion-focus and generativity, and social selection, and less goals focused on knowledge acquisition and the future. However, contrary to prediction, older adults also showed less goal focusing than younger adults, reporting goals from a broader set of life domains (e.g., health, property/possessions, friendship).

摘要

寿命发展的两个著名理论,即社会情感选择性理论和选择、优化与补偿理论,对年轻人和老年人目标表征的差异做出了相似的预测。我们的目的是检验年轻人和老年人的目标是否如这两个理论所预测的那样存在差异。老年人以及两组年轻人(大学生和非大学生)列出了他们当前的目标,然后由独立评分者进行编码。观察到的不同年龄组在目标上的差异总体上支持了这两个理论。具体而言,与年轻人相比,老年人报告的更多目标集中在维持/防止损失、当下、情感聚焦和繁衍以及社会选择上,而较少目标集中在知识获取和未来上。然而,与预测相反的是,老年人的目标聚焦程度也低于年轻人,他们报告的目标来自更广泛的生活领域(如健康、财产/财物、友谊)。

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in goals: testing predictions from selection, optimization, and compensation theory and socioemotional selectivity theory.目标方面的年龄差异:检验来自选择、优化与补偿理论以及社会情感选择理论的预测。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2012;74(2):87-111. doi: 10.2190/AG.74.2.a.
2
Age-related perspectives and emotion processing.年龄相关的观点与情绪处理。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):934-9. doi: 10.1037/a0027368. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
3
Age differences in goals: implications for health promotion.目标中的年龄差异:对健康促进的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2009 May;13(3):336-48. doi: 10.1080/13607860802459815.
4
Age-differential motivational consequences of optimization versus compensation focus in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人中优化与补偿聚焦的年龄差异动机后果。
Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):240-52. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.240.
5
Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger and older adults' recall: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory.思考有限的未来会增强年轻人和年长者回忆的积极性:对社会情感选择性理论的支持。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Aug;44(6):869-82. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0612-0.
6
The influence of age on emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress.年龄对情绪调节策略和心理困扰的影响。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Nov;42(6):668-81. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000453. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: measurement by self-report and construct validity.选择、优化和补偿的生活管理策略:通过自我报告进行测量及结构效度
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):642-62.
8
Memories of social interactions: age differences in emotional intensity.社交互动记忆:情绪强度的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):300-9. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.300.
9
Differences in perception of gerotranscendence behaviors between college students and community-dwelling older adults.大学生与社区老年人对超越老龄行为认知的差异。
J Aging Stud. 2015 Aug;34:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Positive affect, meaning in life, and future time perspective: an application of socioemotional selectivity theory.积极情绪、生活意义和未来时间视角:社会情绪选择理论的应用。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):181-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023965. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between digital engagement and the mental health of older adults: Evidence from China.数字参与与老年人心理健康之间的关系:来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 6;19(8):e0308071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308071. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of residential environment on older people's capabilities to live independently: a survey in Beijing.居住环境对老年人独立生活能力的影响:北京的一项调查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18262-x.
3
Adult age-related differences in susceptibility to social conformity pressures in self-control over daily desires.
成年人在自我控制日常欲望时对社会从众压力易感性方面与年龄相关的差异。
Psychol Aging. 2024 Feb;39(1):102-112. doi: 10.1037/pag0000790. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
How Do Late Adults Experience Meaning During the COVID-19 Lockdown? The Role of Intrinsic Goals.老年人在新冠疫情封锁期间如何体验意义?内在目标的作用。
J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(5):1759-1780. doi: 10.1007/s10902-023-00657-z. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.关于衰老相关准备的观点。
J Elder Policy. 2021 Spring;1(2). doi: 10.18278/jep.1.2.7.
6
Reactive, Agentic, Apathetic, or Challenged? Aging, Emotion, and Coping During the COVID-19 Pandemic.积极应对、主动出击、冷漠旁观还是应对乏力?老龄化、新冠疫情期间的情绪与应对方式。
Gerontologist. 2021 Feb 23;61(2):217-227. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa196.
7
Age-related differences in the goals and concerns that motivate real-life prospective memory tasks.与年龄相关的目标和关注点差异,激发了现实生活中前瞻性记忆任务。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0216888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216888. eCollection 2019.
8
Prospective memory tasks related to goals and concerns are rated as more important by both young and older adults.与目标和关注点相关的前瞻性记忆任务在年轻人和老年人中都被认为更为重要。
Eur J Ageing. 2013 Feb 16;10(3):211-221. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0265-9. eCollection 2013 Sep.
9
Contribution of generative leisure activities to cognitive function in elderly Sri Lankan adults.生成性休闲活动对斯里兰卡老年成年人认知功能的贡献。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Sep;62(9):1707-13. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12985. Epub 2014 Aug 20.