Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M.S. Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore 54, Karnataka State, India.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
The aim of this study was to compare efficacy between the single non-compression titanium miniplate and single three-dimensional titanium miniplate in mandibular angle fracture treatment.
A prospective study of 20 patients with mandibular angle fractures. Patients were randomly categorized into two groups with 10 patients in each group. Group-I patients were treated with single 2.0mm conventional titanium miniplate, Group-II patients were treated with single 2.0mm three-dimensional titanium miniplate according to Champy's principles. Parameters such as stability of fracture fragments, occlusion, mouth opening, additional fixation required and complications were evaluated at different time intervals.
In Group-I, about 40% (n=4) of patients showed unstable fracture fragments on immediate postoperative day whereas in Group-II only 10% (n=1) of patients with fracture instability. In Group-I, 30% (n=3) had mild occlusal derangement and 20% (n=2) had deranged occlusion on immediate postoperative day, where as in Group-II only 20% (n=2) of patients had mild occlusal derangement. Additional fixation required in 30% (n=3) of patients in group-I, and 10% (n=1) in Group-II. 20% (n=2) of patients in Group-I developed infection. All patients in both the groups had inadequate mouth opening on immediate post operative day, later resumed normal mouth opening. 10% (n=1) in group-I and 20% (n=2) of patients in group-II presented with postinjury/preoperative inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance with no incidence of postoperative sensory disturbance. None of the patients in both the groups had malunion, nonunion, plate fracture, and loosening of plates and screws.
3-D titanium miniplates showed more favorable results compared to single conventional titanium miniplate with respect to initial interfragmentary stability and complications.
本研究旨在比较下颌角骨折治疗中单块非压缩钛微型板与单块三维钛微型板的疗效。
前瞻性研究 20 例下颌角骨折患者。患者随机分为两组,每组 10 例。组 I 患者采用 2.0mm 常规钛微型板单块治疗,组 II 患者采用 2.0mm 三维钛微型板按 Champy 原则治疗。在不同时间间隔评估骨折碎片的稳定性、咬合、张口度、所需附加固定和并发症等参数。
组 I 中约 40%(n=4)的患者在术后即刻出现骨折块不稳定,而组 II 中只有 10%(n=1)的患者出现骨折不稳定。组 I 中,30%(n=3)的患者轻度咬合紊乱,20%(n=2)的患者术后即刻咬合紊乱,而组 II 中只有 20%(n=2)的患者轻度咬合紊乱。组 I 中有 30%(n=3)的患者需要附加固定,组 II 中有 10%(n=1)的患者需要附加固定。组 I 中有 20%(n=2)的患者发生感染。两组患者术后即刻张口度均不足,后恢复正常张口度。组 I 中有 10%(n=1)和组 II 中有 20%(n=2)的患者出现损伤/术前下牙槽神经感觉障碍,无术后感觉障碍发生。两组均无畸形愈合、不愈合、钢板骨折、钢板和螺钉松动。
与单块常规钛微型板相比,三维钛微型板在初始断端稳定性和并发症方面具有更优的结果。