Suppr超能文献

血小板闪烁显像、阻抗体积描记法、灰阶及彩色血流双功超声与静脉造影在静脉血栓形成诊断中的比较。

Comparison of platelet scintigraphy, impedance plethysmography gray scale and color flow duplex ultrasound and venography for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.

作者信息

Ezekowitz M D, Migliaccio F, Farlow D, Pope C, Denny D, Markowitz D, Hammers L, Ali A, Hirsh J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;355:23-7.

PMID:2281103
Abstract

The several techniques available for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis have not been directly compared in the same patient population. Thus color and gray scale duplex ultrasound (U), impedance plethysmography (IPG), 3-4 hr platelet imaging (PS) were compared to venography (V), in 104 consecutive patients (in hospital and out). PS and V were read by two, and IPG and U by one, blinded reader. Comparisons were made for the calf (CA), popliteal (Pop) and femoral (Fem) vessels. Reproducibility of V and PS was 84 and 87%. (table; see text) We conclude that PS, while having a very high specificity, has an unacceptably low sensitivity. However, while both impedance plethysmography and color flow ultrasound have excellent and similar diagnostic accuracy in the femoral, these techniques have either a low sensitivity or low technical success rate in the calf or popliteal veins.

摘要

目前有多种可用于诊断静脉血栓形成的技术,但尚未在同一患者群体中进行直接比较。因此,在104例连续患者(包括住院患者和门诊患者)中,将彩色和灰阶双功超声(U)、阻抗体积描记法(IPG)、3 - 4小时血小板成像(PS)与静脉造影(V)进行了比较。PS和V由两名阅片者解读,IPG和U由一名盲法阅片者解读。对小腿(CA)、腘窝(Pop)和股静脉(Fem)血管进行了比较。V和PS的可重复性分别为84%和87%。(表格;见正文)我们得出结论,PS虽然特异性很高,但敏感性低得令人无法接受。然而,尽管阻抗体积描记法和彩色血流超声在股静脉方面具有出色且相似的诊断准确性,但这些技术在小腿或腘静脉中要么敏感性低,要么技术成功率低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验