Ezekowitz M D, Migliaccio F, Farlow D, Pope C, Denny D, Markowitz D, Hammers L, Ali A, Hirsh J
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;355:23-7.
The several techniques available for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis have not been directly compared in the same patient population. Thus color and gray scale duplex ultrasound (U), impedance plethysmography (IPG), 3-4 hr platelet imaging (PS) were compared to venography (V), in 104 consecutive patients (in hospital and out). PS and V were read by two, and IPG and U by one, blinded reader. Comparisons were made for the calf (CA), popliteal (Pop) and femoral (Fem) vessels. Reproducibility of V and PS was 84 and 87%. (table; see text) We conclude that PS, while having a very high specificity, has an unacceptably low sensitivity. However, while both impedance plethysmography and color flow ultrasound have excellent and similar diagnostic accuracy in the femoral, these techniques have either a low sensitivity or low technical success rate in the calf or popliteal veins.
目前有多种可用于诊断静脉血栓形成的技术,但尚未在同一患者群体中进行直接比较。因此,在104例连续患者(包括住院患者和门诊患者)中,将彩色和灰阶双功超声(U)、阻抗体积描记法(IPG)、3 - 4小时血小板成像(PS)与静脉造影(V)进行了比较。PS和V由两名阅片者解读,IPG和U由一名盲法阅片者解读。对小腿(CA)、腘窝(Pop)和股静脉(Fem)血管进行了比较。V和PS的可重复性分别为84%和87%。(表格;见正文)我们得出结论,PS虽然特异性很高,但敏感性低得令人无法接受。然而,尽管阻抗体积描记法和彩色血流超声在股静脉方面具有出色且相似的诊断准确性,但这些技术在小腿或腘静脉中要么敏感性低,要么技术成功率低。