Suppr超能文献

成人上臂丛神经损伤的神经转移和神经修复的系统评价。

A systematic review of nerve transfer and nerve repair for the treatment of adult upper brachial plexus injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5338, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2012 Aug;71(2):417-29; discussion 429. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318257be98.

Abstract

Nerve reconstruction for upper brachial plexus injury consists of nerve repair and/or transfer. Current literature lacks evidence supporting a preferred surgical treatment for adults with such injury involving shoulder and elbow function. We systematically reviewed the literature published from January 1990 to February 2011 using multiple databases to search the following: brachial plexus and graft, repair, reconstruction, nerve transfer, neurotization. Of 1360 articles initially identified, 33 were included in analysis, with 23 nerve transfer (399 patients), 6 nerve repair (99 patients), and 4 nerve transfer + proximal repair (117 patients) citations (mean preoperative interval, 6 ± 1.9 months). For shoulder abduction, no significant difference was found in the rates ratio (comparative probabilities of event occurrence) among the 3 methods to achieve a Medical Research Council (MRC) scale score of 3 or higher or a score of 4 or higher. For elbow flexion, the rates ratio for nerve transfer vs nerve repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.46 (P = .03); for nerve transfer vs nerve transfer + proximal repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.45 (P = .02) and an MRC scale score of 4 was 1.47 (P = .05). Therefore, for elbow flexion recovery, nerve transfer is somewhat more effective than nerve repair; however, no particular reconstruction strategy was found to be superior to recover shoulder abduction. When considering nerve reconstruction strategies, our findings do not support the sole use of nerve transfer in upper brachial plexus injury without operative exploration to provide a clear understanding of the pathoanatomy. Supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration plays an important role in developing individual surgical strategies, and nerve repair (when donor stumps are available) should remain the standard for treatment of upper brachial plexus injury except in isolated cases solely lacking elbow flexion.

摘要

臂丛上干损伤的神经重建包括神经修复和/或转移。目前的文献缺乏支持成人此类涉及肩和肘功能损伤的首选手术治疗的证据。我们系统地检索了 1990 年 1 月至 2011 年 2 月发表的文献,使用多个数据库搜索以下内容:臂丛和移植物、修复、重建、神经转移、神经再支配。在最初确定的 1360 篇文章中,有 33 篇被纳入分析,其中神经转移 23 例(399 例患者)、神经修复 6 例(99 例患者)和神经转移+近端修复 4 例(117 例患者)。(术前平均间隔时间为 6 ± 1.9 个月)。对于肩外展,3 种方法达到医学研究委员会(MRC)分级 3 分或更高或 4 分或更高的比例无显著差异。对于屈肘,神经转移与神经修复达到 MRC 分级 3 的比值比为 1.46(P =.03);神经转移与神经转移+近端修复达到 MRC 分级 3 的比值比为 1.45(P =.02)和 MRC 分级 4 的比值比为 1.47(P =.05)。因此,对于屈肘恢复,神经转移比神经修复更有效;然而,没有发现任何特定的重建策略在恢复肩外展方面优于其他策略。在考虑神经重建策略时,我们的发现不支持在没有手术探查的情况下,单独使用神经转移来治疗臂丛上干损伤,以便对病理解剖有清楚的了解。锁骨上臂丛探查在制定个体化手术策略方面发挥着重要作用,神经修复(当供体残端可用时)仍然是治疗臂丛上干损伤的标准方法,除非仅存在屈肘缺失的孤立病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验