Suppr超能文献

神经转移与神经移植治疗创伤性上丛神经病的比较:系统评价与分析。

Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis.

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, 523 East 72nd Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May 4;93(9):819-29. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01602.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.

摘要

背景

在治疗臂丛神经损伤患者时,对于孤立的上干或 C5-C6-C7 神经根损伤,神经移植与神经转位的治疗效果尚无对比数据。本研究旨在通过系统评价,比较现代丛内神经转位术治疗肩肘功能与自体神经移植治疗上臂丛创伤性损伤的疗效。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库,纳入患者臂丛神经创伤性损伤后 1 年内接受手术且随访时间至少 12 个月的研究。以力量和肩肘运动作为评估指标。采用 Fisher 确切检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较结果,以 0.05 为检验水准。

结果

31 项研究符合纳入标准。247(83%)和 286(96%)例神经转位患者的肘部屈曲力量分别达到 M4 或更高和 M3 或更高,而 57 例神经移植患者中分别为 32(56%)和 47(82%)例(p<0.05)。54 例用于肩功能的双重神经转位患者中,40 例(74%)的肩外展力量达到 M4 或更高,而 57 例单一神经转位和 28 例神经移植患者中分别为 20(35%)和 13(46%)例(p<0.05)。双重神经转位后的平均肩外展和外旋角度分别为 122°(范围,45°至 170°)和 108°(范围,60°至 140°),而单一神经转位的平均肩外展和外旋角度分别为 50°(范围,0°至 100°)和 45°(范围,0°至 140°)。

结论

在已证实的 C5-C6 完全性创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者中,国际汇总数据强烈支持双重神经转位优于传统神经移植,可更好地恢复肩肘功能。这些数据可能有助于考虑术中选择的外科医生,特别是在神经干或神经根看起来不理想,或需要长神经移植的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验