Department of Sport and Exercise Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):135-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
Pedobarography is commonly employed in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However there is no evidence regarding test-retest reliability of this technique in this population, and therefore it was the purpose of the current study to address this clear gap. Dynamic plantar loading and foot geometry data were collected during barefoot gait with the EMED platform (Novel GmbH, Germany) from 10 patients with DPN over two sessions, separated by 28 days. Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and Coefficients of Variation (CoVs) were calculated to determine test-retest reliability. For dynamic plantar loading, reliability differed by outcome measure and foot region, with ICCs of >0.8 and CoVs of <15% observed in most cases. For dynamic foot geometry, ICCs of >0.88 and CoVs of <3% were observed for hallux angle, arch index and coefficient of spreading, while sub-arch angle was less reliable (ICC 0.76, CoV 23%). Overall, the current study observed high levels of test-retest reliability which were generally commensurate with that previously reported in healthy populations.
足底压力分布测量在糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者中通常被应用。然而,目前尚无关于该技术在该人群中测试-重测信度的证据,因此,本研究的目的是解决这一明显的空白。使用 EMED 平台(德国 Novel GmbH)在 10 例 DPN 患者的赤脚步态中采集动态足底负重和足部几何数据,两次测试之间间隔 28 天。计算组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CoV)以确定测试-重测信度。对于动态足底负重,信度因测量指标和足部区域而异,大多数情况下观察到 ICC>0.8 和 CoV<15%。对于动态足部几何,观察到拇趾角、足弓指数和扩散系数的 ICC>0.88 和 CoV<3%,而亚弓角的信度较低(ICC0.76,CoV23%)。总的来说,本研究观察到了高水平的测试-重测信度,这些信度通常与之前在健康人群中报道的信度相当。