Soares Pires F, Caetano Mota P, Melo N, Costa D, Jesus J M, Cunha R, Guimarães S, Souto-Moura C, Morais A
Serviço de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Rev Port Pneumol. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common disease in the subgroup of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. It is inevitably associated to a bad prognosis, although assuming a highly variable clinical course.
Patients with IPF, observed at Interstitial Lung Diseases outpatient clinic of Centro Hospitalar de São João - Porto, Portugal, were identified and clinical, functional, radiological and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) parameters were reviewed. Their clinical course and survival were analyzed in order to identify prognostic factors.
Eighty-one patients were included, with a mean age at diagnosis of 63.8 years old. At diagnosis, the main functional abnormalities were restrictive physiology, reduced lung diffusion and exercise capacity impairment. Clinical course was mainly slowly progressive (72.3%). Ten patients (13.2%) had a rapid progression and 11 (14.5%) patients had an acute exacerbation during the course of the disease. IPF's rapid progression was associated to a higher functional impairment at diagnosis, namely in what is related with Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Total Lung Capacity (TLC). Median survival was 36 months. A significant difference in survival was observed among different types of clinical course - 41 months for slow progressors and 9 months for rapid progressors. Lower levels of FVC, TLC, 6th minute walk test distance and rest PaO2, and higher BAL neutrophil count were associated with poorer survival in univariate analysis.
The analysis of this group of IPF patients confirms two clearly different phenotypes, slow and rapid progressors. Those phenotypes seem to have different presentations and a remarkably different natural history. These results could mean different physiopathologic pathways, which could implicate different therapeutic approaches.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是特发性间质性肺炎亚组中最常见的疾病。尽管其临床病程高度可变,但不可避免地与不良预后相关。
确定在葡萄牙波尔图圣若昂中心医院间质性肺病门诊观察到的IPF患者,并回顾其临床、功能、放射学和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)参数。分析他们的临床病程和生存率以确定预后因素。
纳入81例患者,诊断时的平均年龄为63.8岁。诊断时,主要的功能异常为限制性生理、肺弥散降低和运动能力受损。临床病程主要为缓慢进展型(72.3%)。10例患者(13.2%)进展迅速,11例患者(14.5%)在病程中出现急性加重。IPF的快速进展与诊断时较高的功能损害相关,即与用力肺活量(FVC)和肺总量(TLC)有关。中位生存期为36个月。不同临床病程类型的生存率存在显著差异——缓慢进展型为41个月,快速进展型为9个月。在单因素分析中,较低的FVC、TLC、6分钟步行试验距离和静息PaO₂水平以及较高的BAL中性粒细胞计数与较差的生存率相关。
对这组IPF患者的分析证实了两种明显不同的表型,即缓慢进展型和快速进展型。这些表型似乎有不同的表现和截然不同的自然病程。这些结果可能意味着不同的病理生理途径,这可能暗示不同的治疗方法。