Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Basic Res Cardiol. 2012 Sep;107(5):285. doi: 10.1007/s00395-012-0285-1. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
Efficacy of ischemic preconditioning is decreased in animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus while the responses in humans with diabetes are contradictory. It is unknown whether attenuation is related to decreased release of a mediating humoral cardioprotective factor or reduced ability to respond in the target tissue. The aim of the present study was to investigate the release and effect of a circulating cardioprotective factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Blood samples were drawn from nine non-diabetic subjects, eight diabetic patients without peripheral neuropathy, and eight diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy before (control) and after a remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) stimulus. Blood samples were dialyzed against Krebs-Henseleit buffer and the cardioprotective effects of the dialysates were tested in rabbit hearts mounted on a Langendorff model and subjected to 30-min global ischemia and 120-min reperfusion. rIPC dialysate from non-diabetic and diabetic subjects without peripheral neuropathy reduced infarct size and improved hemodynamic recovery compared to control dialysate from non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. However, in the subgroup of diabetic patients with neuropathy the cardioprotective effect was attenuated. These findings indicate that the release mechanism involves neural pathways.
在 2 型糖尿病动物模型中,缺血预处理的疗效降低,而糖尿病患者的反应则存在矛盾。目前尚不清楚这种衰减是否与介导的体液性心脏保护因子释放减少或靶组织反应能力降低有关。本研究旨在探讨 2 型糖尿病患者循环心脏保护因子的释放和作用。从 9 名非糖尿病受试者、8 名无周围神经病变的糖尿病患者和 8 名有周围神经病变的糖尿病患者中抽取血液样本,在(对照)前和远程缺血预处理(rIPC)刺激后抽取血液样本。血液样本用 Krebs-Henseleit 缓冲液透析,并用 Langendorff 模型上的兔心进行透析液的心脏保护作用测试,并进行 30 分钟的整体缺血和 120 分钟的再灌注。与非糖尿病和无周围神经病变的糖尿病患者的对照透析液相比,非糖尿病和无周围神经病变的糖尿病患者的 rIPC 透析液可减少梗死面积并改善血流动力学恢复。然而,在有神经病变的糖尿病患者亚组中,心脏保护作用减弱。这些发现表明,释放机制涉及神经通路。