Suppr超能文献

镫骨切除术使用微型钻与穿孔器的比较。

Microdrill versus perforator for stapedotomy.

作者信息

Gjuric M

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Zagreb, Yugoslavia.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1990 Oct;15(5):411-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1990.tb00492.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the hearing results of performing stapedotomy using either a microdrill or a perforator. Two groups of patients, otherwise similar, were followed up for at least 2 years after the stapedotomy. It was possible to create 0.8 mm fenestra in 91.6% of our patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in hearing results. The results showed a continuous improvement in the first 6 post-operative months after which the hearing stabilized. In our hands, the microdrill has not proved to be more traumatic than the perforator to the inner ear.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用微型钻头或穿孔器进行镫骨手术的听力结果。两组情况相似的患者在镫骨手术后至少随访了2年。我们91.6%的患者能够制造出0.8毫米的开窗。两组的听力结果没有显著差异。结果显示,术后前6个月听力持续改善,之后听力稳定。在我们的操作中,微型钻头对内耳造成的创伤并不比穿孔器更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验