Venditti Angelo, Ronk Chanda, Kopenhaver Tracey, Fetterman Susan
Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;23(3):302-11. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e31825dfee2.
Tele-intensive care unit (ICU) technology has been proven to bridge the gap between available resources and quality care for many health care systems across the country. Tele-ICUs allow the standardization of care and provide a second set of eyes traditionally not available in the ICU. A growing body of literature supports the use of tele-ICUs based on improved outcomes and reduction in errors. To date, the literature has not effectively outlined the limitations of this technology related to response to changes in patient care, interventions, and interaction with the care team. This information can potentially have a profound impact on service expectations. Some misconceptions about tele-ICU technology include the following: tele-ICU is "watching" 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; tele-ICU is a telemetry unit; tele-ICU is a stand-alone crisis intervention tool; tele-ICU decreases staffing at the bedside; tele-ICU clinical roles are clearly defined and understood; and tele-ICUs are not cost-effective to operate. This article outlines the purpose of tele-ICU technology, reviews outcomes, and "busts" myths about tele-ICU technology.
远程重症监护病房(ICU)技术已被证明能为全国许多医疗系统弥合现有资源与优质护理之间的差距。远程ICU实现了护理的标准化,并提供了传统ICU中所没有的另一双眼睛。越来越多的文献支持基于改善治疗效果和减少差错而使用远程ICU。迄今为止,文献尚未有效概述该技术在应对患者护理变化、干预措施以及与护理团队互动方面的局限性。这些信息可能会对服务期望产生深远影响。关于远程ICU技术的一些误解包括:远程ICU每周7天、每天24小时都在“监控”;远程ICU是一个遥测病房;远程ICU是一个独立的危机干预工具;远程ICU减少了床边的工作人员配备;远程ICU的临床角色已得到明确界定和理解;以及运营远程ICU不具有成本效益。本文概述了远程ICU技术的目的,回顾了治疗效果,并“破除”了关于远程ICU技术的神话。