• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二类牵引/1 型功能矫治器治疗后咬合力及其与稳定性的关系。

Bite force and its association with stability following Class II/1 functional appliance treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2013 Aug;35(4):434-41. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs038. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjs038
PMID:22828079
Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the value of pre-treatment maximal molar bite force as a predictive variable in determining post-treatment changes and stability following functional appliance treatment in Class II malocclusion children. Twenty-eight Class II malocclusion children having undergone functional appliance treatment were followed for at least 1 year post-treatment. Maximal molar bite force measurements, lateral cephalograms, and study casts were taken before treatment, after treatment, and after post-treatment follow-up. Relationships between pre-treatment maximal molar bite force and dental or cephalometric changes post-treatment were examined. Patients were divided into stable and unstable groups, based on dental sagittal changes (overjet and molar relationship), and differences between the two groups of patients determined. Post-treatment changes varied widely. Thirteen children showed dentoalveolar sagittal relapse, namely a shift in molars towards a Class II relationship and an increase in overjet, while 15 did not. The unstable group demonstrated a lower pre-treatment maximal molar bite force, as well as a more obtuse gonial angle, than the stable group. The gonial angle was found to be negatively correlated to maximal molar bite force and may thus be a cephalometric indicator partly reflecting the functional condition of the masticatory muscles. Children with a lower pre-treatment maximal molar bite force were more prone to dentoalveolar sagittal relapse following functional appliance treatment.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨治疗前最大磨牙咬合力作为预测变量在确定功能性矫治器治疗 II 类错牙合儿童治疗后变化和稳定性中的价值。对 28 例接受功能性矫治器治疗的 II 类错牙合儿童进行了至少 1 年的治疗后随访。在治疗前、治疗后和治疗后随访时,分别测量最大磨牙咬合力、侧颅面片和研究模型。检查治疗前最大磨牙咬合力与治疗后牙颌或头影测量变化之间的关系。根据牙齿矢状向变化(覆牙合和磨牙关系)将患者分为稳定组和不稳定组,并确定两组患者的差异。治疗后变化差异较大。13 例儿童出现牙弓矢状向复发,即磨牙向 II 类关系移动,覆牙合增加,而 15 例儿童未出现复发。不稳定组治疗前最大磨牙咬合力较低,下颌角较钝,与稳定组相比差异有统计学意义。下颌角与最大磨牙咬合力呈负相关,因此可能是反映咀嚼肌功能状况的头影测量指标。治疗前最大磨牙咬合力较低的儿童在接受功能性矫治器治疗后更易出现牙弓矢状向复发。

相似文献

1
Bite force and its association with stability following Class II/1 functional appliance treatment.二类牵引/1 型功能矫治器治疗后咬合力及其与稳定性的关系。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Aug;35(4):434-41. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs038. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.磨牙力预测值对 II 类功能矫治器治疗效果的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):244-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq184. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
3
Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled study.咬肌厚度和咬合力对II类功能矫治器治疗的预测价值:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Dec;37(6):570-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju089. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
4
One year treatment effects of the eruption guidance appliance in 7- to 8-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial.萌出诱导矫治器对7至8岁儿童的一年治疗效果:一项随机临床试验
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):128-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju014. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
5
Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.早期混合牙列中用方丝弓赫斯特矫治器进行 II 类矫治的稳定性:骨骼和牙齿变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.036.
6
Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures.不同咬合高度的被动性后牙咬合板对颅面和牙牙槽结构影响的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Aug;112(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70243-9.
7
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.对使用延长疗程、强化、带环Herbst矫治器随后使用固定矫治器治疗的安氏II类1分类患者的头影测量研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020.
8
Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.II类固定功能矫治器治疗的稳定性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
9
Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.下颌骨发育不足的安氏II类1分类病例使用Twin Block矫治器时并发的骨骼和牙槽骨变化:一项头影测量研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):218-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.105014.
10
Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes obtained with customised and preformed eruption guidance appliances after 1-year treatment in early mixed dentition.在混合牙列早期使用定制和预成萌出引导装置治疗 1 年后获得的骨骼和牙牙槽变化。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Sep 1;24(3):180 - 187. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.1727. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of malocclusion on jaw motor function and chewing in children: a systematic review.错颌畸形对儿童颌骨运动功能和咀嚼的影响:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2335-2351. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04356-y. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of The Effects of Orthodontic or Functional Orthopaedic Treatment on Masseter Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声评估正畸或功能矫形治疗对面肌影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jun 7;55(6):256. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060256.
3
Evaluation of the effects of modified bonded rapid maxillary expansion on occlusal force distribution: A pilot study.
改良式粘结快速上颌扩弓对咬合力分布影响的评估:一项初步研究。
Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):103-108. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175695.
4
Predictive factors of sagittal stability after treatment of Class II malocclusions.安氏II类错牙合畸形治疗后矢状向稳定性的预测因素。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):1033-1041. doi: 10.2319/052415-350.1. Epub 2015 Nov 30.