Suppr超能文献

智能防反流阀是否会限制 0.9%生理盐水通过静脉留置针的流速?

Do SmartSite antireflux valves limit the flow rate of 0.9% normal saline through intravenous cannulas?

机构信息

Gold Coast Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):123-5. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835730fc.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether the placement of a SmartSite antireflux valve between a bag of fluid with line giving set and an intravenous cannula decreases the flow rate. Fluid flow rates were compared in paired experiments with and without an antireflux valve using a pressure infuser or allowing fluid to flow by gravity only for four different sizes of intravenous cannulas (20-14 G). Antireflux valves significantly decreased the fluid flow rates for all cannula sizes, irrespective of whether a pressure infuser was used. The decrease in the flow rate was most marked for larger cannulas [gravity only: 14 G: 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-68), 16 G: 39% (95% CI: 34-43); pressure bag: 14 G: 74% (95% CI: 70-78), 16 G: 56% (95% CI: 54-57); all P<0.001]. Where maximum fluid flow rates are desirable, clinicians should consider not using an antireflux valve.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在液体袋与输液管之间放置 SmartSite 反流阀是否会降低流速。通过压力输液器或仅让液体通过重力流动,对四种不同尺寸的静脉内套管(20-14 G)进行配对实验,比较有和没有反流阀时的流体流速。无论是否使用压力输液器,反流阀都会显著降低所有套管尺寸的流体流速。对于较大的套管,流速下降更为明显[仅重力:14 G:52%(95%置信区间(CI):37-68),16 G:39%(95% CI:34-43);压力袋:14 G:74%(95% CI:70-78),16 G:56%(95% CI:54-57);所有 P<0.001]。在需要最大流速的情况下,临床医生应考虑不使用反流阀。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验