Leonardi A, Fregona I A, Gismondi M, Daniotti E, Carniel G, Secchi A G
Regional Centre for the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Inflammatory Eye Diseases, University of Padova, Italy.
Eye (Lond). 1990;4 ( Pt 5):760-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.109.
In order to assess the potential usefulness of CPT as a diagnostic tool for ocular allergy, the correlation between skin/RAST tests and CPT was determined in 144 patients affected by allergic 'hay fever' type conjunctivitis. The results showed that an agreement between skin/RAST tests and CPT occurred in 71% of the cases (130/183). Of the 29% uncorrelated cases, 23% (43/183) were positive for at least one specific antigen by skin/RAST tests but not by CPT, while 6% (10/183) were positive for at least one specific antigen by CPT, but not by skin/RAST tests. CPT dramatically increased the histamine levels in tears (p less than 0.001). These findings show that (1) systemic tests can be misleading in that they may suggest a specific sensitisation which, in fact, does not involve the conjunctiva (systemic test positive/CPT negative); (2) CPT can identify local conjunctival sensitisation in the absence of a systemic sensitisation (systemic test negative/CPT positive); (3) CPT can demonstrate that allergic 'hay fever' type conjunctivitis may be related to allergens different from those responsible for a systemic sensitisation.
为了评估结膜激发试验(CPT)作为眼部过敏诊断工具的潜在效用,我们在144例患有过敏性“花粉症”型结膜炎的患者中确定了皮肤/放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)与CPT之间的相关性。结果显示,71%的病例(130/183)皮肤/RAST试验与CPT结果一致。在29%不相关的病例中,23%(43/183)通过皮肤/RAST试验至少对一种特异性抗原呈阳性反应,但CPT结果为阴性,而6%(10/183)通过CPT至少对一种特异性抗原呈阳性反应,但皮肤/RAST试验结果为阴性。CPT显著提高了泪液中的组胺水平(p<0.001)。这些发现表明:(1)全身试验可能会产生误导,因为它们可能提示一种实际上并不涉及结膜的特异性致敏(全身试验阳性/CPT阴性);(2)CPT可以在不存在全身致敏的情况下识别局部结膜致敏(全身试验阴性/CPT阳性);(3)CPT可以证明过敏性“花粉症”型结膜炎可能与导致全身致敏的过敏原不同。