Suppr超能文献

GNAS1 和 PHD2 短干扰 RNA 支持体外和体内绵羊模型中的骨再生。

GNAS1 and PHD2 short-interfering RNA support bone regeneration in vitro and in an in vivo sheep model.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2541-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2475-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our ability to guide cells in biomaterials for in vivo bone repair is limited and requires novel strategies. Short-interfering RNA (siRNA) allows the regulation of multiple cellular pathways. Core binding factor alpha 1 (Cbfa1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathways can be modulated to direct bone formation via siRNA against guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-stimulating activity polypeptide 1 (siGNAS1) and prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2 (siPHD2), respectively.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether the administration of siGNAS1 and siPHD2 in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) promotes osteogenic phenotype, the dose-dependent effects of siGNAS1 on MSC differentiation to osteogenic phenotype, and whether the two siRNAs promote bone formation in vivo.

METHODS

siRNAs were administered to MSCs at Day 0, and protein expression of bone-specific markers was assessed at Days 1, 2, and 4 (n = 3/group/time point). In an in vivo model using seven sheep, chambers containing silk fibroin-chitosan (SFCS) scaffolds with siRNA were implanted over the periosteum and harvested at Days 7, 21, 36, and 70 (n = 4/group/time point, except at Day 70 [n = 2]) to assess bone formation.

RESULTS

siGNAS1 promoted collagen I and osteopontin expression, whereas siPHD2 had no effect in vitro. Dose-dependent effects of siGNAS1 on ALP expression were maximal at Day 1 for 10 μg/mL and Day 4 for 100 μg/mL. In vivo, by Day 70, mean bone volume increased compared to Day 7 for siGNAS1-SFCS (47.8 versus 1.8 mg/mL) and siPHD2-SFCS (61.3 versus 1.5 mg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Both siPHD2 and siGNAS1 support bone regeneration in vivo, whereas only siGNAS1 regulates bone phenotype in MSCs in vitro.

摘要

背景

我们引导细胞在生物材料中进行体内骨修复的能力有限,需要新的策略。小干扰 RNA (siRNA) 可以调节多个细胞途径。核心结合因子 α 1 (Cbfa1) 和缺氧诱导因子 1 (HIF-1) 途径可以通过针对鸟嘌呤核苷酸结合蛋白 α 刺激活性多肽 1 (siGNAS1) 和脯氨酰羟化酶结构域蛋白 2 (siPHD2) 的 siRNA 进行调节,以分别指导骨形成。

问题/目的:我们确定了在间充质干细胞 (MSCs) 中给予 siGNAS1 和 siPHD2 是否促进成骨表型,siGNAS1 对 MSC 向成骨表型分化的剂量依赖性影响,以及这两种 siRNA 是否促进体内骨形成。

方法

在第 0 天给予 siRNA,在第 1、2 和 4 天(n = 3/组/时间点)评估骨特异性标志物的蛋白表达。在一项使用七只绵羊的体内模型中,将含有丝素纤维蛋白-壳聚糖 (SFCS) 支架的腔室植入骨膜下,并在第 7、21、36 和 70 天(n = 4/组/时间点,除第 70 天 [n = 2])收获以评估骨形成。

结果

siGNAS1 促进胶原蛋白 I 和骨桥蛋白的表达,而 siPHD2 则无体外作用。siGNAS1 对 ALP 表达的剂量依赖性影响在第 1 天的 10 μg/mL 和第 4 天的 100 μg/mL 达到最大。在体内,到第 70 天,siGNAS1-SFCS(47.8 与 1.8 mg/mL)和 siPHD2-SFCS(61.3 与 1.5 mg/mL)与第 7 天相比,骨量平均增加。

结论

siPHD2 和 siGNAS1 均可支持体内骨再生,而只有 siGNAS1 可调节体外 MSCs 的骨表型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e042/3830105/853d1dd69051/11999_2012_2475_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验