Bornstein R F, Greenberg R P, Leone D R, Galley D J
Gettysburg College.
J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1990 Winter;18(4):654-66. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1990.18.4.654.
Although there has been a great deal of research assessing behavioral correlates of oral dependency, the defensive style of the oral dependent person remains unexplored. This paper describes two studies investigating the orality--defense mechanism relationship. In the first study, 154 undergraduate subjects (74 males and 80 females) completed the Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI; Gleser and Ihilevich, 1969), and were administered the Group Rorschach test which was scored for oral dependent content in the standard manner (Masling, 1986). In the second study, 64 undergraduate subjects (30 males and 34 females) completed the DMI and the Lazare-Klerman Trait Scale (Lazare, Klerman & Armor, 1966, 1970). Results of both studies indicated that orality is positively related to the use of turning-against-self (TAS) defenses, and negatively related to the use of turning-against-object (TAO) defenses in male subjects. In both studies, orality scores were negatively related to scores on a DMI-derived index of outward-directed aggression (AGG) in males. In Study 2, neither obsessiveness nor hysteria scores were related to TAS, TAO or AGG scores in subjects of either sex. Findings are discussed in the context of previous research on oral dependence.
尽管已有大量研究评估口腔依赖的行为相关性,但口腔依赖者的防御方式仍未得到探索。本文描述了两项研究口腔性与防御机制关系的研究。在第一项研究中,154名本科受试者(74名男性和80名女性)完成了防御机制量表(DMI;Gleser和Ihilevich,1969),并接受了团体罗夏测验,该测验以标准方式对口腔依赖内容进行评分(Masling,1986)。在第二项研究中,64名本科受试者(30名男性和34名女性)完成了DMI和拉扎尔-克莱曼特质量表(Lazare、Klerman和Armor,1966年、1970年)。两项研究的结果均表明,在男性受试者中,口腔性与自我攻击(TAS)防御方式的使用呈正相关,与对象攻击(TAO)防御方式的使用呈负相关。在两项研究中,男性的口腔性得分与DMI衍生的外向攻击性(AGG)指数得分呈负相关。在研究2中,无论是男性还是女性受试者,强迫性或癔症得分均与TAS、TAO或AGG得分无关。研究结果将结合先前关于口腔依赖的研究进行讨论。