• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

critically 重新评估 ATLS 低血容量性休克分类:它真的反映临床实际情况吗?

A critical reappraisal of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: does it really reflect clinical reality?

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.012
PMID:22835498
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to validate the classification of hypovolaemic shock given by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS).

METHODS

Patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU(®) database between 2002 and 2010 were analyzed. First, patients were allocated into the four classes of hypovolaemic shock by matching the combination of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) according to ATLS. Second, patients were classified by only one parameter (HR, SBP or GCS) according to the ATLS classification and the corresponding changes of the remaining two parameters were assessed within these four groups. Analyses of demographic, injury and therapy characteristics were performed as well.

RESULTS

36,504 patients were identified for further analysis. Only 3411 patients (9.3%) could be adequately classified according to ATLS, whereas 33,093 did not match the combination of all three criteria given by ATLS. When patients were grouped by HR, there was only a slight reduction of SBP associated with tachycardia. The median GCS declined from 12 to 3. When grouped by SBP, GCS dropped from 13 to 3 while there was no relevant tachycardia observed in any group. Patients with a GCS=15 presented normotensive and with a HR of 88/min, whereas patients with a GCS<12 showed a slight reduced SBP of 117mmHg and HR was unaltered.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock does not seem to reflect clinical reality accurately.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)所给出的低血容量性休克分类。

方法

分析了 2002 年至 2010 年期间创伤登记数据库(TraumaRegister DGU®)中的患者。首先,根据 ATLS 将心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)的组合分配给低血容量性休克的四个类别。其次,根据 ATLS 分类,仅使用一个参数(HR、SBP 或 GCS)对患者进行分类,并评估这四个组中剩余两个参数的相应变化。还进行了人口统计学、损伤和治疗特征的分析。

结果

确定了 36504 名患者进行进一步分析。只有 3411 名患者(9.3%)可以根据 ATLS 进行充分分类,而 33093 名患者不符合 ATLS 给出的所有三个标准的组合。当按 HR 分组时,仅与心动过速相关的 SBP 略有下降。GCS 中位数从 12 降至 3。当按 SBP 分组时,GCS 从 13 降至 3,而任何组中均未观察到相关的心动过速。GCS=15 的患者表现为正常血压和 HR 为 88/min,而 GCS<12 的患者表现为 SBP 略有降低(117mmHg),HR 未改变。

结论

本研究表明,ATLS 对低血容量性休克的分类似乎不能准确反映临床实际情况。

相似文献

1
A critical reappraisal of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: does it really reflect clinical reality? critically 重新评估 ATLS 低血容量性休克分类:它真的反映临床实际情况吗?
Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
The ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock: a well established teaching tool on the edge?《创伤高级生命支持(ATLS)®》对低血容量性休克的分类:一种行之已久却处于边缘的教学工具?
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.015.
3
Assessment of hypovolaemic shock at scene: is the PHTLS classification of hypovolaemic shock really valid?现场低血容量性休克评估:PHTLS 低血容量性休克分类真的有效吗?
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jan;31(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202130. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
4
Is the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock appreciated in daily trauma care? An online-survey among 383 ATLS course directors and instructors.在日常创伤护理中,创伤高级生命支持(ATLS)对低血容量性休克的分类是否得到认可?对383名ATLS课程主任和教员进行的在线调查。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Feb;32(2):134-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202727. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Vital signs and estimated blood loss in patients with major trauma: testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock.严重创伤患者的生命体征和估计失血量:验证 ATLS 低血容量性休克分类的有效性。
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):556-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Testing the validity of the ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock.检测 ATLS 低血容量性休克分类的有效性。
Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.007.
7
Renaissance of base deficit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base deficit-based classification for hypovolemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®.基础碱缺失在创伤患者初始评估中的复兴:基于16305例来自创伤注册数据库DGU®患者数据制定的低血容量性休克的基础碱缺失分类法
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 6;17(2):R42. doi: 10.1186/cc12555.
8
A comparison of base deficit and vital signs in the early assessment of patients with penetrating trauma in a high burden setting.在高负担环境下穿透性创伤患者早期评估中碱缺失与生命体征的比较
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1972-1977. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Comparison of the Previous and Current Trauma-Related Shock Classifications: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Level I Trauma Center.新旧创伤相关休克分类的比较:来自一级创伤中心的回顾性队列研究。
Eur Surg Res. 2021;62(4):229-237. doi: 10.1159/000516102. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Validating the ATLS Shock Classification for Predicting Death, Transfusion, or Urgent Intervention.验证 ATLS 休克分类对预测死亡、输血或紧急干预的效果。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:163-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.041. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Prehospital and In-Hospital Management of Patients with Severe Trauma.严重创伤患者院前及院内管理的最新进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2208. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072208.
2
Major Bleeding in the Emergency Department: A Practical Guide for Optimal Management.急诊科的严重出血:最佳管理实用指南
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 25;14(3):784. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030784.
3
Simulating the methodological bias in the ATLS classification of hypovolemic shock: a critical reappraisal of the base deficit renaissance.模拟 ATLS 分类法中低血容量性休克方法学偏倚:对碱缺失复兴的批判性再评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 25;32(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01276-0.
4
The non-haemorrhagic vagal response to trauma: a review of hypotensive and bradycardic responses to injury in the absence of bleeding.创伤性非出血性迷走神经反应:无出血情况下损伤导致的低血压和心动过缓反应综述。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):1995-2004. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02648-y. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Transfusion Practices in Severely Injured Patients at a Level 1 Trauma Center.一级创伤中心严重受伤患者的输血实践
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2024 Apr-Jun;17(2):84-90. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_58_23. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
Control of Haemorrhage in Orthopaedic Trauma.骨科创伤中的出血控制
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 22;13(14):4260. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144260.
7
Early Physiologic Numerical and Waveform Characteristics of Simulated Hemorrhagic Events With Healthy Volunteers Donating Blood.健康志愿者献血时模拟出血事件的早期生理数值和波形特征。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Mar 26;6(4):e1073. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001073. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Pulse Pressure: A Predictor of Intervention in Blunt Abdominal Trauma.脉压:钝性腹部创伤干预的预测指标
Cureus. 2023 Jul 3;15(7):e41305. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41305. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南》第六版
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 1;27(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7.
10
Utility of ETCO2 to predict hemorrhagic shock in multiple trauma patients.呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO2)预测多发伤患者失血性休克的价值。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;52(1):206-215. doi: 10.3906/sag-2103-206. Epub 2022 Feb 22.