Panteghini M, Pagani F
First Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
J Clin Lab Anal. 1990;4(6):449-52. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860040611.
We evaluated the diagnostic utility of measuring pancreatic isoamylase (P-AMY) with a double-monoclonal antibody technique in a population of 43 consecutive hospitalized hyperamylasemic patients in comparison with serum pancreatic lipase (LPS) activity. In 27 cases (62.8%), the final diagnosis was acute pancreatitis. Predictive values were calculated for P-AMY and LPS activities, and a P-AMY percentage was calculated for selected decision levels. The maximal diagnostic efficiency was 0.930, 0.814, and 0.767 for LPS, P-AMY activity, and P-AMY percentage, respectively, indicating that serum LPS measurement was clinically superior to P-AMY for distinguishing patients with or without pancreatitis. Measurement of both P-AMY activity and percentage in serum did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.
我们采用双单克隆抗体技术检测了43例连续住院的高淀粉酶血症患者的胰腺淀粉酶(P-AMY),并与血清胰脂肪酶(LPS)活性进行比较,以评估其诊断效用。最终诊断为急性胰腺炎的有27例(62.8%)。计算了P-AMY和LPS活性的预测值,并针对选定的决策水平计算了P-AMY百分比。LPS、P-AMY活性和P-AMY百分比的最大诊断效率分别为0.930、0.814和0.767,这表明在区分有无胰腺炎患者方面,血清LPS检测在临床上优于P-AMY。同时检测血清P-AMY活性和百分比并不能显著提高诊断准确性。