Lacourcière Y, Poirier L, Boucher S, Spenard J
Hypertension Research Unit, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada.
J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Oct;4(5):553-6.
We compared the effects of sustained-release diltiazem and captopril on blood pressure control and lipid profile. Forty-eight patients with primary hypertension were included in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study and 43 completed the trial. Following a two-to four-week placebo run-in period, each patient initially received either diltiazem (60-180 mg twice daily) or captopril (25-75 mg twice daily) for 16 weeks and then crossed over to the other drug after an interim placebo washout period. Both drugs significantly reduced systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DPB) blood pressure compared to baseline. However, supine (P less than 0.01), sitting and standing (P less than 0.05) DPB was lower with diltiazem than with captopril. Moreover, BP control (sitting DBP less than 90 mmHg) was achieved in a greater proportion of patients treated with diltiazem (63 vs 44%). Heart rate was significantly reduced (P less than 0.001) with diltiazem in all positions but was unchanged with captopril. Lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations were not modified with either treatment. We conclude that both diltiazem and captopril are effective antihypertensive agents without deleterious effects on lipid metabolism. However diltiazem provides a better prolonged control of BP and may offer some advantages for patients in whom a slower heart rate would be beneficial.
我们比较了缓释地尔硫䓬和卡托普利对血压控制及血脂谱的影响。48例原发性高血压患者纳入了这项随机、双盲、交叉研究,43例完成了试验。在为期2至4周的安慰剂导入期后,每位患者最初接受地尔硫䓬(每日两次,每次60 - 180毫克)或卡托普利(每日两次,每次25 - 75毫克)治疗16周,然后在中间的安慰剂洗脱期后换用另一种药物。与基线相比,两种药物均显著降低收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。然而,地尔硫䓬组的仰卧位舒张压(P < 0.01)、坐位和立位舒张压(P < 0.05)低于卡托普利组。此外,地尔硫䓬治疗的患者中达到血压控制(坐位DBP < 90 mmHg)的比例更高(63%对44%)。地尔硫䓬在所有体位均显著降低心率(P < 0.001),而卡托普利对心率无影响。两种治疗均未改变血脂、脂蛋白和载脂蛋白浓度。我们得出结论,地尔硫䓬和卡托普利都是有效的抗高血压药物,对脂质代谢无不良影响。然而,地尔硫䓬能更好地长期控制血压,对于心率较慢有益的患者可能具有一些优势。