Redox routes to substitution of aluminum(III): synthesis and characterization of (IP-)2AlX (IP = α-iminopyridine, X = Cl, Me, SMe, S2CNMe2, C≡CPh, N3, SPh, NHPh).

Redox active ligands are shown to facilitate a variety of group transfer reactions at redox inert aluminum(III). Disulfides can be used as a two-electron group transfer reagent, and we show that (IP(-))(2)AlSR can be formed by reaction of [(THF)(6)Na][(IP(2-))(2)Al] (1c) with disulfides RSSR (where X = C(S)NMe(2), 4; SMe, 5). In a more general redox route to substitution of aluminum bis(iminopyridine) complexes, we report zinc(II) salts as a group transfer reagent. Reaction of ((R)IP(2-))(2)Al (R = H, 1c; Me, 1d) with ZnX(2) affords ((R)IP(-))(2)AlX (where IP = iminopyridine, R = H, and X = Cl, 2; CCPh, 6; N(3), 7; SPh, 8; or R = Me and X = NHPh, 9). Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of the complexes reveal that each of the five coordinate complexes reported here has a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with τ = 0.668 - 0.858. We observed a correlation between the greatest deviations from ideal trigonal bipyramidal symmetry (lowest τ values), the bond lengths consistent with smallest degree of ligand reduction, and the least polarizable X ligand in (IP(-))(2)AlX. Complex 4 is six-coordinate and is best described as distorted octahedral. Variable temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements indicate that each of the complexes 3-9 has a biradical electronic structure similar to previously reported 2. Magnetic exchange coupling constants in the range J = -94 to -212 cm(-1) were fit to the data for 2-9 to describe the energy of antiferromagnetic interaction between ligand radicals assuming a spin Hamiltonian of the form Ĥ = -2JŜ(L(1))·Ŝ(L(2)). The strongest coupling occurs when the angle between the ligand planes is smallest, presumably to afford good overlap with the Al-X σ* orbital. Electrochemical properties of the complexes were probed using cyclic voltammetry and each of 3-9 displayed a reversible two-electron reduction and two quasi-reversible one-electron oxidation processes. The energy of the ligand based redox processes for 2-9 differ by about 150 mV over all complexes and show a correlation with the degree of IP(-) reduction observed crystallographically; more reduced IP(-) ligands require higher potentials for further reduction. Comproportionation constants that describe the equilibrium for the reaction (IP(-))(2)AlX + (IP)(2)AlX ↔ (IP(-))(IP)AlX fall in the range of K(c) = 10(5.7) to 10(7.9) for 3-9.