Division of Trauma and Burns, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, United States.
Resuscitation. 2013 Mar;84(3):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
Barrier precautions protect patients and providers from blood-borne pathogens. Although barrier precaution compliance has been shown to be low among adult trauma teams, it has not been evaluated during paediatric resuscitations in which perceived risk of disease transmission may be low. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with compliance with barrier precautions during paediatric trauma resuscitations.
Video recordings of resuscitations performed on injured children (<18 years old) were reviewed to determine compliance with an established policy requiring gowns and gloves. Depending on activation level, trauma team members included up to six physicians, four nurses, and a respiratory therapist. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effect of team role, resuscitation factors, and injury mechanism on barrier precaution compliance.
Over twelve weeks, 1138 trauma team members participated in 128 resuscitations (4.7% penetrating injuries, 9.4% highest level activations). Compliance with barrier precautions was 81.3%, with higher compliance seen among roles primarily at the bedside compared to positions not primarily at the bedside (90.7% vs. 65.1%, p<0.001). Bedside residents (98.4%) and surgical fellows (97.6%) had the highest compliance, while surgical attendings (20.8%) had the lowest (p<0.001). Controlling for role, increased compliance was observed during resuscitations of patients with penetrating injuries (OR=3.97 [95% CI: 1.35-11.70], p=0.01), during resuscitations triaged to the highest activation level (OR=2.61 [95% CI: 1.34-5.10], p=0.005), and among team members present before patient arrival (OR=4.14 [95% CI: 2.29-7.39], p<0.001).
Compliance with barrier precautions varies by trauma team role. Team members have higher compliance when treating children with penetrating and high acuity injuries and when arriving before the patient. Interventions integrating barrier precautions into the workflow of team members are needed to reduce this variability and improve compliance with universal precautions during paediatric trauma resuscitations.
屏障预防措施可保护患者和医护人员免受血源性病原体的侵害。虽然已证明成人创伤团队的屏障预防措施依从性较低,但在疾病传播风险可能较低的儿科复苏中,尚未对此进行评估。本研究的目的是确定与儿科创伤复苏期间屏障预防措施依从性相关的因素。
对受伤儿童(<18 岁)进行的复苏录像进行了回顾,以确定是否符合一项既定政策,该政策要求穿手术服和手套。根据激活级别,创伤团队成员最多包括 6 名医生、4 名护士和 1 名呼吸治疗师。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定团队角色、复苏因素和损伤机制对屏障预防措施依从性的影响。
在十二周内,1138 名创伤团队成员参与了 128 次复苏(4.7%为穿透性损伤,9.4%为最高级别激活)。屏障预防措施的依从率为 81.3%,与非主要在床边的角色相比,主要在床边的角色的依从率更高(90.7%比 65.1%,p<0.001)。床边住院医师(98.4%)和外科研究员(97.6%)的依从率最高,而外科主治医生(20.8%)的依从率最低(p<0.001)。控制角色后,在穿透性损伤患者的复苏中(比值比[OR]=3.97[95%置信区间[CI]:1.35-11.70],p=0.01)、在分诊至最高激活级别的复苏中(OR=2.61[95%CI:1.34-5.10],p=0.005)以及在患者到达前在场的团队成员中(OR=4.14[95%CI:2.29-7.39],p<0.001),观察到依从性增加。
创伤团队成员的屏障预防措施依从性因角色而异。当治疗穿透性和高急症损伤的儿童以及在患者到达前到达时,团队成员的依从性更高。需要将屏障预防措施整合到团队成员的工作流程中,以减少这种变异性并提高儿科创伤复苏期间的普遍预防措施的依从性。