Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38.
The last several years has witnessed an explosion in genomics, with the advent of genome-wide association studies revealing hundreds of DNA variants significantly associated with most common diseases, including cancer. On the heels of these scientific advances came the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing industry. Genome-wide scans for disease have been marketed and sold directly to the public, without the involvement of a health care provider. Unlike genetic testing for mutations in known hereditary cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1/2, these genomic profiles examine DNA variants, which typically have a minimal risk impact, and account for only a fraction of the heritable component of cancer. Furthermore, risk information provided to consumers does not account for family history or other known risk factors. The clinical validity and utility of personal genome scans for disease risk prediction remain for the most part unestablished, although some argue lack of evidence of harm and the possibility that positive impacts on health behaviors or genetic awareness may result from consumer use. The DTC genetic testing industry has sparked significant controversy not only among the scientific community, but also among professional societies and government agencies.In this review, we present some of the history and methodological considerations of DTC genomic profiling, with a focus on cancer risk prediction. The literature regarding consumer awareness and utilization is explored, including understanding, expectations, and behavioral and psychological responses to DTC genomic risk prediction. Primary care provider and genetic professional knowledge and perceptions of DTC genomic profiling are also addressed. Ethical and scientific controversy surrounding the DTC genetic testing industry is presented, along with policy recommendations, regulatory actions, and the changing landscape of the DTC genetic testing market in response. Although our understanding of the human genome holds much promise in the realm of cancer prevention and treatment, DTC genomic profiling for cancer risk prediction is unlikely in its current form to have any significant impact on the health of the public. Time will tell if the next venture in genomic medicine, whole genome sequencing, will be accompanied by the translational research and emphasis on public/provider education required to ensure its successful application toward reducing the burden of cancer at a population level.
过去几年见证了基因组学的爆炸式发展,全基因组关联研究的出现揭示了数百种与大多数常见疾病(包括癌症)显著相关的 DNA 变体。在这些科学进步的推动下,直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测行业应运而生。针对疾病的全基因组扫描已在市场上进行营销,并直接向公众销售,而无需医疗保健提供者的参与。与检测 BRCA1/2 等已知遗传性癌症易感性基因的突变的基因检测不同,这些基因组图谱检查 DNA 变体,这些变体通常风险影响极小,仅占癌症可遗传性的一小部分。此外,向消费者提供的风险信息不考虑家族史或其他已知风险因素。个人基因组扫描在疾病风险预测方面的临床有效性和实用性在很大程度上尚未确定,尽管有人认为缺乏证据表明存在危害,以及消费者使用可能会对健康行为或遗传意识产生积极影响。DTC 基因检测行业不仅在科学界引起了极大的争议,而且在专业协会和政府机构中也引起了争议。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了 DTC 基因组分析的一些历史和方法学考虑因素,重点是癌症风险预测。探讨了有关消费者意识和利用的文献,包括对 DTC 基因组风险预测的理解、期望以及行为和心理反应。还讨论了初级保健提供者和遗传专业人员对 DTC 基因组分析的了解和看法。介绍了围绕 DTC 基因检测行业的伦理和科学争议,以及政策建议、监管行动以及 DTC 基因检测市场的变化情况,以应对这些争议。尽管我们对人类基因组的理解在癌症预防和治疗领域具有很大的潜力,但 DTC 基因组分析用于癌症风险预测在其当前形式下不太可能对公众健康产生任何重大影响。时间将证明,基因组医学的下一个冒险,全基因组测序,是否会伴随着转化研究和对公众/提供者教育的重视,以确保其在降低人群癌症负担方面的成功应用。