Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):441-5; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182583e4f.
Surgical site infections are common, with an incidence of 1.5% to 5% for all types of surgery. In vitro studies suggest an antimicrobial effect of local anesthetic. We hypothesized that subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetic before surgical incision would reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infection.
In a wound infection model using 4- to 6-week-old female mice, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were inoculated in surgical wounds infiltrated with local anesthetic or saline. On day 5, the mice were killed and tissues were evaluated for viable bacterial numbers, presence of bacteria histologically, and degree of inflammation on a scale of 0 to 3 based on number and types of inflammatory cells and presence of necrosis.
A one-way between-subjects analysis of variance with Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc comparisons showed no statistically significant difference in the degree of inflammation in mice infiltrated with lidocaine, lidocaine mixed with bupivacaine, or saline (p = 0.994, p = 0.337, and p = 0.792, respectively). A Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc analysis demonstrated that the saline (p = 0.038) and lidocaine mixed with bupivacaine (p = 0.006) had significantly lower degrees of inflammation than did the lidocaine group. A Bonferroni post hoc test demonstrated that those in the lidocaine (p = 0.003) and lidocaine mixed with bupivacaine (p = 0.008) groups had significantly higher inflammation than those in the saline group after controlling for the condition of the inocula.
Infiltrate, whether saline, lidocaine, or lidocaine mixed with Marcaine, did not result in significantly different bacterial presence or higher degree of inflammation when controlling for experimental condition of bacterial inocula. Thus, subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetic before a surgical incision is made does not reduce the incidence of bacterial growth or influence the degree of inflammation which alters infection rates.
手术部位感染很常见,所有类型手术的发生率为 1.5%至 5%。体外研究表明局麻药具有抗菌作用。我们假设在手术切口前皮下浸润局麻药会降低术后伤口感染的发生率。
在使用 4 至 6 周龄雌性小鼠的伤口感染模型中,将金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌接种到浸润局麻药或生理盐水的手术伤口中。第 5 天,处死小鼠,根据炎性细胞的数量和类型以及有无坏死,对组织进行活细菌数量、组织学细菌存在情况和 0 至 3 级炎症程度评估。
采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey Honestly Significant Difference 事后比较的方法,对浸润利多卡因、利多卡因与布比卡因混合液或生理盐水的小鼠的炎症程度进行分析,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.994、p = 0.337 和 p = 0.792)。Tukey Honestly Significant Difference 事后分析显示,生理盐水组(p = 0.038)和利多卡因与布比卡因混合液组(p = 0.006)的炎症程度明显低于利多卡因组。Bonferroni 事后检验显示,在控制接种物状况后,利多卡因组(p = 0.003)和利多卡因与布比卡因混合液组(p = 0.008)的炎症程度明显高于生理盐水组。
在控制细菌接种物实验条件的情况下,浸润盐水、利多卡因或利多卡因与布比卡因混合液不会导致细菌存在或炎症程度明显不同。因此,手术切口前皮下浸润局麻药并不能降低细菌生长或影响炎症程度,从而改变感染率。