• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺叶状肿瘤(不典型性小叶增生/小叶原位癌)的核心针活检诊断后的长期随访。

Long-term follow-up of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ) diagnosed on core needle biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3131-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2534-9. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2534-9
PMID:22847124
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lobular neoplasia (LN) includes atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). LN often is an incidental finding on breast core needle biopsy (CNBx) and management remains controversial. Our objective was to define the incidence of malignancy in women diagnosed with pure LN on CNBx, and identify a subset of patients that may be observed.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LN on CNB between January 1993 and December 2010 were identified. Patients with an associated high-risk lesion or ipsilateral malignancy at time of diagnosis were excluded. All cases were reviewed by dedicated breast pathologists and breast imagers for pathologic classification and radiologic concordance, respectively.

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 184 (1.3 %) cases of pure LN (147 ALH, 37 LCIS) from 180 patients. Pathologic-radiologic concordance was achieved in 171 (93 %) cases. Excision was performed in 101 (55 %) cases and 83 (45 %) were observed. Mean follow-up was 50.3 (range, 6-212) months. Of cases excised, 1 of 81 (1.2 %) ALH and 1 of 20 (5 %) LCIS cases were upstaged to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), respectively. Only 1 of 101 (1 %) concordant lesions was upstaged on excision. Of the cases observed, 4 of 65 (6.2 %) developed ipsilateral cancer during follow-up: 1 of 51 (2 %) case of ALH and 3 of 14 (21.4 %) cases with LCIS (2 ILC, 2 DCIS). During follow-up, 2.9 % (4/138) patients with excised or observed LN developed a contralateral cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support that not all patients with LN diagnosed on CNB require surgical excision. Patients with pure ALH, demonstrating radiologic-pathologic concordance, may be safely observed.

摘要

背景

小叶肿瘤(LN)包括不典型小叶增生(ALH)和小叶原位癌(LCIS)。LN 通常是乳腺芯针活检(CNBx)的偶然发现,其处理仍存在争议。我们的目的是确定在 CNBx 上诊断为纯 LN 的女性中恶性肿瘤的发生率,并确定可能可以观察的患者亚组。

方法

确定 1993 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间在 CNB 上诊断为 LN 的患者。排除在诊断时伴有高危病变或同侧恶性肿瘤的患者。所有病例均由专门的乳腺病理学家和乳腺成像专家分别进行病理分类和放射学一致性评估。

结果

研究队列由 180 例患者中的 184 例(1.3%)纯 LN(147 例 ALH,37 例 LCIS)组成。171 例(93%)病例达到病理-放射学一致性。101 例(55%)进行了切除,83 例(45%)进行了观察。平均随访时间为 50.3 个月(范围为 6-212 个月)。在切除的病例中,1 例 ALH(1.2%)和 1 例 LCIS(5%)分别升级为导管原位癌(DCIS)和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)。仅 1 例(1%)符合条件的病变在切除后升级。在观察的病例中,65 例中有 4 例(6.2%)在随访期间发生同侧癌症:51 例 ALH 中有 1 例(2%),14 例 LCIS 中有 3 例(21.4%),其中包括 2 例 ILC 和 2 例 DCIS。在随访期间,切除或观察到 LN 的 138 例患者中有 2.9%(4 例)发生对侧癌症。

结论

这些数据支持并非所有在 CNB 上诊断为 LN 的患者都需要手术切除。表现出放射-病理一致性的纯 ALH 患者可以安全观察。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ) diagnosed on core needle biopsy.乳腺叶状肿瘤(不典型性小叶增生/小叶原位癌)的核心针活检诊断后的长期随访。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3131-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2534-9. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?粗针活检发现小叶原位癌或非典型小叶增生:是否需要切除活检?
Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):813-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874. Epub 2004 Apr 22.
3
The significance of lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia of the breast.乳腺小叶原位癌和不典型小叶增生的意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4124-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2538-5. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
4
Lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy does not require excision.粗针活检发现的小叶肿瘤无需切除。
Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2152-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23415.
5
Lobular in-situ neoplasia on breast core needle biopsy: imaging indication and pathologic extent can identify which patients require excisional biopsy.乳腺芯针活检中的小叶原位肿瘤:影像学表现和病理范围可确定哪些患者需要进行切除术活检。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):914-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2034-3. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
6
Lobular carcinoma in situ/atypical lobular hyperplasia on breast needle biopsies: does it warrant surgical excisional biopsy? A study of 27 cases.乳腺针吸活检中的原位癌/不典型小叶增生:是否需要手术切除活检?27 例研究。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2010 Aug;14(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2010.04.002.
7
Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.11号真空辅助立体定向活检的小叶瘤变:与手术切除活检及乳腺X线随访的相关性
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):949-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0710.
8
Surgical outcome of biopsy-proven lobular neoplasia: is there any difference between lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia?经活检证实的小叶肿瘤的手术结果:原位小叶癌和不典型小叶增生之间有区别吗?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):288-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7212.
9
Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia.核心乳腺活检显示小叶原位癌时应行切除术,对不典型小叶增生行监测是合理的。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):1132-1145. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15425. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised?经粗针活检诊断的小叶原位癌:何时应进行切除?
Mod Pathol. 2003 Feb;16(2):120-9. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000051930.68104.92.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Non-Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ at the Lumpectomy Margin Increase Local Recurrence?保乳术后切缘非典型性小叶原位癌是否增加局部复发?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6061-6069. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13899-1. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Risk of Lobular Neoplasia Upgrade with Synchronous Carcinoma.伴有癌的小叶肿瘤升级风险。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6350-6358. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12129-4. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
3
Breast screening atypia and subsequent development of cancer: protocol for an observational analysis of the Sloane database in England (Sloane atypia cohort study).
乳腺筛查不典型增生及后续癌症发展:对英国斯隆数据库(斯隆不典型增生队列研究)进行观察性分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):e058050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058050.
4
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ during Preoperative Biopsy and the Rate of Upgrade.术前活检中的乳腺原位小叶癌及升级率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Oct;54(4):1074-1080. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.864. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
5
High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations.乳腺高危病变:同步诊断工具及管理建议
Insights Imaging. 2021 May 26;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01005-6.
6
Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.基于临床和影像学的多变量模型作为决策支持工具的性能,有助于避免高危乳腺病变的不必要手术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(2):479-494. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05947-1. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
Outcomes of classic lobular neoplasia diagnosed on breast core needle biopsy: a retrospective multi-center study.乳腺核心针活检诊断的经典小叶肿瘤的结局:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Virchows Arch. 2020 Feb;476(2):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02685-8. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Trends in frequency and outcome of high-risk breast lesions at core needle biopsy in women recalled at biennial screening mammography, a multiinstitutional study.在两年一次的筛查性乳房 X 光摄影中,对召回的女性进行核心针活检的高危乳腺病变的频率和结果趋势,一项多机构研究。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Nov 15;145(10):2720-2727. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32353. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.乳腺护理模式的转变:多学科环境下影像学的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):248-255. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17130. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.在粗针活检中诊断出的高危乳腺病变的升级率:单机构经验及文献综述
Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19.