Fagö-Olsen Carsten L, Ottesen Bent, Kehlet Henrik, Markauskas Algirdas, Mosgaard Berit J, Ottosen Christian, Søgaard Charlotte H, Søgaard-Andersen Erik, Høgdall Claus
Gynækologisk Afdeling, Sektion 7821, Juliane Marie Centret, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4477.
The traditional first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer with primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial as some authors report a potential benefit from the alternative treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of NACT in Denmark in regard to increased use and regional differences.
Stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer patients treated in the five Danish tertiary referral centres in the 2005-2010-period were included. The study is based on validated data from The Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database.
Of the 1,367 eligible patients 1,069 were treated with PDS and 298 with NACT. In 2005-2007, 11% of patients were treated with NACT. In 2008-2010, this percentage had risen to 30% (p < 0.00001). Between the five referral centres, the use of NACT ranged from 6% to 41% in 2005-2010 (p < 0.00001); from 1 % to 31% in 2005-2007 (p < 0.00001); from 10% to 48% in 2008-2010 (p < 0.00001) and from 9% to 48% in 2010 (p < 0.0008). Patients treated with NACT were significantly older, had inferior ASA scores and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status compared with the patients from the PDS group. There was no difference between treatments in regard to body mass index, stage IV disease or patients with no co-morbidity.
The use of NACT as first-line treatment tripled from 2005-2010, but the regional variability was large which calls for a uniform agreement on treatment principles and evaluation.
This study was financially supported by grants from The Copenhagen University Hospital Research Foundation, Manufacturer Einar Willumsens Memorial Trust, The Capital Region of Denmark Research Foundation, The Arvid Nilsson Foundation, The King Christian X Foundation, The Dagmar Marshall Foundation, The Danish Research Foundation, and The Hans and Nora Buchard Foundation.
not relevant.
对于晚期卵巢癌患者,传统的一线治疗方案是初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)和辅助化疗,但存在争议,因为一些作者报告称新辅助化疗(NACT)和中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术这种替代治疗可能具有益处。本研究的目的是调查丹麦NACT的使用情况,包括使用增加情况和地区差异。
纳入2005 - 2010年期间在丹麦五家三级转诊中心接受治疗的IIIC期和IV期卵巢癌患者。该研究基于丹麦妇科癌症数据库的有效数据。
在1367例符合条件的患者中,1069例接受了PDS治疗,298例接受了NACT治疗。在2005 - 2007年,11%的患者接受了NACT治疗。在2008 - 2010年,这一比例升至30%(p < 0.00001)。在五家转诊中心之间,2005 - 2010年NACT的使用比例在6%至41%之间(p < 0.00001);2005 - 2007年在1%至31%之间(p < 0.00001);2008 - 2010年在10%至48%之间(p < 0.00001);2010年在9%至48%之间(p < 0.0008)。与PDS组患者相比,接受NACT治疗的患者年龄显著更大,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态更差。在体重指数、IV期疾病或无合并症患者方面,两种治疗方法之间没有差异。
从2005 - 2010年,NACT作为一线治疗的使用增加了两倍,但地区差异很大,这需要在治疗原则和评估方面达成统一共识。
本研究由哥本哈根大学医院研究基金会、制造商埃纳尔·威廉姆森纪念信托基金、丹麦首都地区研究基金会、阿维德·尼尔森基金会、克里斯蒂安十世国王基金会、达格玛·马歇尔基金会、丹麦研究基金会以及汉斯和诺拉·布查德基金会提供资金支持。
不相关。