Suppr超能文献

能量和蛋白质补充对生长育肥牛牧草消化和尿素动力学的影响。

Effects of supplemental energy and protein on forage digestion and urea kinetics in growing beef cattle.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1600, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3492-504. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4458. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

Abstract

Effects of supplemental energy sources on nutrient digestion and urea kinetics at 2 levels of degradable intake protein were evaluated in cattle (Bos taurus). Six ruminally and duodenally cannulated steers (208 ± 17 kg) were used in a 6 × 6 Latin square with treatments arranged as a 3 × 2 factorial. Energy treatments included a control, 600 g glucose dosed ruminally once daily, and 480 g VFA infused ruminally over 8 h daily. Casein (120 or 240 g) was dosed ruminally once daily. Steers had ad libitum access to prairie hay (5.8% CP). Jugular infusion of (15)N(15)N-urea with measurement of enrichment in urine was used to measure urea kinetics. Infusing VFA decreased (P < 0.01) forage intake by 27%. Supplementing glucose decreased (P < 0.01) total tract NDF digestibility and tended to decrease ruminal NDF digestibility; depressions in response to glucose tended to be greater at the lower level of casein. Increasing casein decreased (P < 0.02) ruminal pH. Infusing VFA decreased pH only during infusions, whereas glucose decreased pH 2 h after dosing. Ruminal concentrations of NH(3), acetate, and propionate decreased and butyrate concentration increased when glucose was supplemented. Increasing casein supplementation increased (P < 0.01) ruminal concentrations of NH(3), acetate, and propionate. Supplemental energy decreased (P = 0.03) plasma urea-N concentration, but casein level did not affect it (P = 0.16). Microbial N flow was greater (P < 0.04) for 240 than for 120 g/d casein but was not affected by supplemental energy (P = 0.23). Urea-N entry rate and gut entry of urea-N were not affected (P ≥ 0.12) by supplemental energy or casein, but the proportion of urea production that was recycled to the gut was less (P = 0.01) when 240 g/d rather than 120 g/d casein was provided. Compared with VFA, glucose tended (P = 0.07) to increase the proportion of urea-N entry rate that was recycled to the gut. Supplementation with glucose led to more (P = 0.01) microbial uptake of recycled urea than did supplementation with VFA. Urea recycling did not differ greatly among treatments despite impacts on ruminal pH and NH(3) and on plasma urea-N that were expected to alter urea transport across ruminal epithelium. Lack of treatment effects on urea production indicate that the complete diets did not provide excessive amounts of N and that increases of intestinally available AA were used efficiently by cattle for protein deposition.

摘要

在两种可降解蛋白采食量水平下,评估了补充能源对牛(Bos taurus)营养消化和尿素动力学的影响。6 头瘤胃和十二指肠插管的阉牛(208 ± 17 kg)采用 6×6 拉丁方设计,处理方式为 3×2 析因设计。能量处理包括对照、每日瘤胃内给予 600 g 葡萄糖、每日 8 h 瘤胃内给予 480 g VFA。酪蛋白(120 或 240 g)每日瘤胃内给予。阉牛可自由采食草原干草(5.8% CP)。使用(15)N(15)N-尿素的颈静脉内输注并测量尿液中的富集来测量尿素动力学。灌注 VFA 降低(P < 0.01)饲草采食量 27%。补充葡萄糖降低(P < 0.01)总肠道 NDF 消化率,并趋于降低瘤胃 NDF 消化率;葡萄糖的反应降低趋势在较低的酪蛋白水平下更大。增加酪蛋白降低(P < 0.02)瘤胃 pH。灌注 VFA 仅在灌注期间降低 pH,而葡萄糖在给药后 2 小时降低 pH。瘤胃中 NH(3)、乙酸和丙酸的浓度降低,丁酸的浓度增加,而葡萄糖补充时增加。增加酪蛋白补充增加(P < 0.01)瘤胃中 NH(3)、乙酸和丙酸的浓度。补充能量降低(P = 0.03)血浆尿素氮浓度,但酪蛋白水平不影响(P = 0.16)。微生物氮流量大于 240 时比 120 g/d 酪蛋白(P < 0.04)但不受补充能量(P = 0.23)影响。尿素氮进入率和尿素氮进入肠道不受补充能量或酪蛋白的影响(P ≥ 0.12),但当提供 120 g/d 而非 240 g/d 酪蛋白时,尿素产生的再循环比例降低(P = 0.01)。与 VFA 相比,葡萄糖趋于(P = 0.07)增加尿素氮进入率的再循环比例。与灌注 VFA 相比,葡萄糖补充导致更多(P = 0.01)微生物对再循环尿素的吸收。尽管对瘤胃 pH 和 NH(3)以及血浆尿素氮有影响,预计会改变尿素通过瘤胃上皮的转运,但各处理之间的尿素再循环差异不大。尿素产生不受处理影响表明,完整日粮没有提供过多的氮,并且肠道可利用的 AA 增加被牛有效地用于蛋白质沉积。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验