Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC), 11 Third Hospital Avenue, 168751, SNEC, Singapore.
BMC Med Imaging. 2012 Aug 1;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-25.
The CorneaL GrAft Thickness Evaluation (COLGATE) system was recently developed to facilitate the evaluation of corneal graft thickness from OCT images. Graft thickness measurement can be a surrogate indicator for detecting graft failure or success. The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of the COLGATE system in measuring DSAEK graft area between two observers.
This was a prospective case series in which 50 anterior segment OCT images of patients who had undergone DSAEK in either eye were analysed. Two observers (MW, AC) independently obtained the image analysis for the graft area using both semi automated and automated method. One week later, each observer repeated the analysis for the same set of images. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to analyze inter and intra observer agreement.
There was strong intraobserver correlation between the 2 semi automated readings obtained by both observers. (r = 0.936 and r = 0.962). Intraobserver ICC for observer 1 was 0.936 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.963) and 0.967 (95% CI 0.942 to 0.981) for observer 2. Likewise, there was also strong interobserver correlation (r = 0.913 and r = 0.969). The interobserver ICC for the first measurements was 0.911 (95% CI 0.849 to 0.949) and 0.968 (95% CI 0.945 to 0.982) for the second. There was statistical difference between the automatic and the semi automated readings for both observers (p = 0.006, p = 0.003). The automatic readings gave consistently higher values than the semi automated readings especially in thin grafts.
The analysis from the COLGATE programme can be reproducible between different observers. Care must be taken when interpreting the automated analysis as they tend to over estimate measurements.
角膜移植厚度评估(COLGATE)系统最近被开发出来,用于从 OCT 图像中评估角膜移植厚度。移植厚度测量可以作为检测移植失败或成功的替代指标。本研究的目的是确定两位观察者使用 COLGATE 系统测量 DSAEK 移植物面积的可重复性。
这是一项前瞻性病例系列研究,分析了 50 例接受 DSAEK 手术的患者的眼前节 OCT 图像。两名观察者(MW、AC)分别使用半自动和自动方法独立获取移植物面积的图像分析。一周后,每位观察者对同一组图像重复分析。采用 Bland-Altman 分析评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
两名观察者获得的 2 个半自动读数之间存在很强的观察者内相关性。(r=0.936 和 r=0.962)。观察者 1 的观察者内 ICC 为 0.936(95%CI 0.890 至 0.963)和 0.967(95%CI 0.942 至 0.981),观察者 2 为 0.967(95%CI 0.942 至 0.981)。同样,观察者间也存在很强的相关性(r=0.913 和 r=0.969)。第一次测量的观察者间 ICC 为 0.911(95%CI 0.849 至 0.949)和 0.968(95%CI 0.945 至 0.982),第二次测量的 ICC 为 0.911(95%CI 0.849 至 0.949)和 0.968(95%CI 0.945 至 0.982)。两位观察者的自动读数与半自动读数之间存在统计学差异(p=0.006,p=0.003)。自动读数给出的值明显高于半自动读数,尤其是在薄移植物中。
不同观察者之间使用 COLGATE 程序进行分析具有可重复性。在解释自动分析结果时需要小心,因为它们往往会高估测量值。