Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):E54-63. doi: 10.1086/666984. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
Biologists have long debated whether ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny and, if so, why. Two plausible explanations are that (i) changes to early developmental stages are selected against because they tend to disrupt later development and (ii) simpler structures often precede more complex ones in both ontogeny and phylogeny if the former serve as building blocks for the latter. It is difficult to test these hypotheses experimentally in natural systems, so we used a computational system that exhibits evolutionary dynamics. We observed that ontogeny does indeed recapitulate phylogeny; traits that arose earlier in a lineage's history also tended to be expressed earlier in the development of individuals. The relative complexity of traits contributed substantially to this correlation, but a significant tendency toward recapitulation remained even after accounting for trait complexity. This additional effect provides evidence that selection against developmental disruption also contributed to the conservation of early stages in development.
生物学家长期以来一直在争论个体发生是否重演系统发生,如果是,原因是什么。有两个合理的解释是:(i)早期发育阶段的变化受到选择的限制,因为它们往往会破坏后期的发育;(ii)如果早期结构为后期结构提供构建块,那么在个体发生和系统发生中,简单的结构通常先于复杂的结构。在自然系统中,很难通过实验来检验这些假说,因此我们使用了一个表现出进化动态的计算系统。我们观察到个体发生确实重演了系统发生;在一个谱系的历史上更早出现的特征也往往在个体发育的早期表达。特征的相对复杂性对这种相关性有很大的贡献,但即使考虑到特征的复杂性,重演的趋势仍然很明显。这种额外的效应提供了证据,表明对发育中断的选择也有助于早期发育阶段的保存。