Greenberg Marna Rayl, Miller Andrew C, Mackenzie Richard S, Richardson David M, Ahnert Amy M, Sclafani Mia J, Jozefick Jennifer L, Goyke Terrence E, Rupp Valerie A, Burmeister David B
Department of Emergency Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gend Med. 2012 Oct;9(5):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Many reports suggest gender disparity in cardiac care as a contributor to the increased mortality among women with heart disease.
We sought to identify gender differences in the management of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Alert-activated ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients that may have resulted from prehospital initiation.
A retrospective database was created for MI Alert STEMI patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) of an academic community hospital with 74,000 annual visits from April 2000 through December 2008. Included were patients meeting criteria for an MI Alert (an institutional clinical practice guideline designed to expedite cardiac catheterization for STEMI patients). Data points (before and after initiation of a prehospital alert protocol) were compared and used as markers of therapy: time to ECG, receiving β-blockers, and time to the catheterization laboratory (cath lab). Differences in categorical variables by patient sex were assessed using the χ(2) test. Medians were estimated as the measure of central tendency. Quantile regression models were used to assess differences in median times between subgroups.
A total of 1231 MI Alert charts were identified and analyzed. The majority of the study population were male (70%), arrived at the ED via ambulance (60.1%), and were taking a β-blocker (67.8%) or aspirin (91.6%) at the time of the ED admission. Female patients were more likely than male patients to arrive at the ED via ambulance (65.9% vs 57.6%, respectively; P = 0.014). The median age of female patients was 68 years, whereas male patients were significantly younger (median age, 59 years; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients currently taking a β-blocker or low-dose aspirin did not vary by gender. Overall, 78.2% of the MI Alert patients arriving at the ED were MI2 (alert initiated by ED physician), and this did not vary by gender (P = 0.33). A total of 1064 MI Alert patients went to the cath lab: 766 male patients (88.9%) and 298 female patients (80.8%). Overall, the median time to cath lab arrival was 79 minutes for men and 81 minutes for women (P = 0.38). Overall, the median time to cath lab arrival significantly decreased from MI1 to MI3, (P(trend) < 0.001). For prehospital-initiated alerts (MI3), the median time to cath lab arrival was the same for men and women (64 minutes; P = 1.0). For hospital-initiated alerts, time to cath lab arrival was 82 minutes for male patients and 84 minutes for female patients (P = 0.38). Prehospital activation of the process decreased the time to the cath lab by 19 minutes (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 13.2-24.8).
No significant gender differences were apparent in the STEMI patients analyzed, whether the MI Alert was initiated in the ED or prehospital initiated. Initiating prehospital-based alerts significantly decreased the time to the cath lab.
许多报告表明,心脏护理中的性别差异是导致心脏病女性死亡率增加的一个因素。
我们试图确定心肌梗死(MI)警报激活的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在管理方面的性别差异,这些差异可能源于院前启动。
为2000年4月至2008年12月期间每年有74000人次就诊的一家学术社区医院急诊科收治的MI警报STEMI患者创建了一个回顾性数据库。纳入的患者符合MI警报标准(一项旨在加快STEMI患者心脏导管插入术的机构临床实践指南)。比较数据点(院前警报协议启动前后)并将其用作治疗指标:心电图检查时间、接受β受体阻滞剂治疗情况以及到达导管插入实验室(导管室)的时间。使用χ(2)检验评估患者性别在分类变量上的差异。中位数被估计为集中趋势的度量。分位数回归模型用于评估亚组之间中位数时间的差异。
共识别并分析了1231份MI警报病历。研究人群中大多数为男性(70%),通过救护车到达急诊科(60.1%),并且在急诊科入院时正在服用β受体阻滞剂(67.8%)或阿司匹林(91.6%)。女性患者比男性患者更有可能通过救护车到达急诊科(分别为65.9%和57.6%;P = 0.014)。女性患者的中位年龄为68岁,而男性患者明显更年轻(中位年龄59岁;P < 0.001)。目前正在服用β受体阻滞剂或低剂量阿司匹林的患者比例在性别上没有差异。总体而言,到达急诊科的MI警报患者中有78.2%为MI2(由急诊科医生启动警报),这在性别上没有差异(P = 0.33)。共有1064名MI警报患者前往导管室:766名男性患者(88.9%)和298名女性患者(80.8%)。总体而言,男性到达导管室的中位时间为79分钟,女性为81分钟(P = 0.38)。总体而言,从MI1到MI3,到达导管室的中位时间显著缩短(P(趋势) < 0.001)。对于院前启动的警报(MI3),男性和女性到达导管室的中位时间相同(64分钟;P = 1.0)。对于医院启动的警报,男性患者到达导管室的时间为82分钟,女性患者为84分钟(P = 0.38)。院前启动该流程使到达导管室的时间缩短了19分钟(P < 0.001;95% CI,13.2 - 24.8)。
在所分析的STEMI患者中,无论MI警报是在急诊科启动还是院前启动,均未发现明显的性别差异。启动基于院前的警报显著缩短了到达导管室的时间。