The Reproductive Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P. R. of China.
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012 Dec;58(6):348-53. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2012.708087. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Several studies have reported improved IVF by shortening the time of sperm-oocyte coincubation from 16-18 hours to 1-4 hours. The objective of this study was to examine the advantages and disadvantages of a shortened sperm-oocyte coincubation time in order to assess the effects of this insemination method for clinical IVF practice. Two insemination methods, the shortened method (4 hours) and the standard method (16-18 hours) of coincubation of sperm-oocytes for two groups of patients based on the quality of sperm were compared. Group I, was composed of couples without male factor; Group II, involved couples with mild male factor. Fertilization, good quality embryos, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were compared by two different insemination methods. In Group I, fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were not different between the two insemination methods. However, the polyspermy rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the shortened (7.3%) than in the standard (4.1%) insemination method. In Group II, the fertilization rate was significantly lower (P < 0.05) using the shortened insemination method (62.6%) compared to the standard insemination method (68.7%). When fertilization failed with the shortened insemination method, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were 34.7% and 24.1%, respectively, from the rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The live birth rate from the rescue ICSI was 32.0% with normal infants. The duration of sperm-oocyte coincubation does not affect fertilization, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates. However, fertilization rates will decrease with the shortened insemination method when the sperm parameters are poor. From the results of the present study we suggest that the combination of the shortened sperm-oocyte coincubation and rescue ICSI method may be an efficient method for IVF treatment in order to prevent fertilization failure when sperm parameters were poor as mild male factor.
几项研究报告称,通过将精子-卵子共孵育时间从 16-18 小时缩短至 1-4 小时,可以提高试管婴儿技术的成功率。本研究旨在探讨缩短精子-卵子共孵育时间的优缺点,以评估这种授精方法对临床试管婴儿实践的影响。
我们根据精子质量,将两组患者分为两组,分别采用缩短(4 小时)和标准(16-18 小时)的精子-卵子共孵育方法。
无男方因素的夫妇;第二组:轻度男方因素的夫妇。比较两种不同授精方法的受精率、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率和种植率。
在第一组中,两种授精方法的受精率、临床妊娠率和种植率无差异。然而,缩短授精组的多精受精率明显高于标准授精组(7.3%比 4.1%,P<0.05)。在第二组中,缩短授精组的受精率明显低于标准授精组(62.6%比 68.7%,P<0.05)。当缩短授精方法受精失败时,从补救性卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)中获得的临床妊娠率和种植率分别为 34.7%和 24.1%。从补救性 ICSI 获得的活产率为 32.0%,新生儿正常。精子-卵子共孵育时间不影响受精率、胚胎质量、临床妊娠率和种植率。然而,当精子参数较差时,缩短授精方法的受精率会降低。
根据本研究的结果,我们建议缩短精子-卵子共孵育时间与补救性 ICSI 方法相结合,可能是一种有效的 IVF 治疗方法,以防止当精子参数较差时受精失败。