• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脂质体两性霉素 B 与葡萄糖酸锑钠治疗旅行者巴西利什曼原虫皮肤利什曼病的比较。

Liposomal amphotericin B in comparison to sodium stibogluconate for Leishmania braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis in travelers.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Feb;68(2):284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.014
PMID:22858005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New World cutaneous leishmaniasis is mostly acquired in the Amazon Basin of Bolivia where L viannia (V) braziliensis is endemic. Treatment with systemic pentavalent antimonial compounds has been shown to be effective in achieving clinical cure in only 75% of cases.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) treatment for primary infection of cutaneous L (V) braziliensis.

METHODS

A prospective observational evaluation was performed for cutaneous leishmaniasis due to L (V) braziliensis which was treated with L-AmB, 3 mg/kg, for 5 consecutive days, and a sixth dose on day 10. This therapy regimen was compared with the treatment regimen of sodium stibogluconate (SSG) 20 mg/kg for 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Our study was divided into two groups; 34 patients received L-AmB and 34 received SSG treatment. Almost all patients were infected in Bolivia. In the L-AmB group, 29 patients (85%) had complete cure compared with 70% in the SSG group (P = not significant), 4 other patients were slow healers, and only one patient needed additional treatment with SSG. No relapses were seen during a mean 29-month follow-up period. Failure rate was 3% in the L-AmB versus 29% in the SSG group (P = .006). Treatment was interrupted in 65% of patients taking SSG because of adverse events, whereas all patients receiving L-AmB completed treatment.

LIMITATIONS

This was a non-blinded comparative study.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of L-Amb to SSG treatment for L (V) braziliensis shows that the former is effective, better tolerated, and more cost effective. L-AmB should therefore be considered as the first-line treatment option for cutaneous L (V) braziliensis infection.

摘要

背景

新热带皮肤利什曼病主要发生在玻利维亚亚马逊流域,那里流行的是利什曼原虫(V)巴西利什曼原虫。全身性五价锑化合物治疗已被证明在 75%的病例中能有效实现临床治愈。

目的

我们旨在评估脂质体两性霉素 B(L-AmB)治疗原发性皮肤利什曼原虫(V)巴西利什曼原虫感染的疗效和安全性。

方法

对因利什曼原虫(V)巴西利什曼原虫引起的皮肤利什曼病进行了前瞻性观察评估,采用 L-AmB 治疗,剂量为 3mg/kg,连续 5 天,第 10 天给予第 6 剂。该治疗方案与葡萄糖酸锑钠(SSG)20mg/kg治疗 3 周的方案进行了比较。

结果

我们的研究分为两组;34 例患者接受 L-AmB 治疗,34 例患者接受 SSG 治疗。几乎所有患者均在玻利维亚感染。在 L-AmB 组,29 例(85%)患者完全治愈,而 SSG 组为 70%(P=无显著差异),4 例患者为愈合缓慢者,仅 1 例患者需要用 SSG 进行额外治疗。在平均 29 个月的随访期间,未观察到复发。L-AmB 组的失败率为 3%,而 SSG 组为 29%(P=0.006)。由于不良反应,65%接受 SSG 治疗的患者中断了治疗,而所有接受 L-AmB 治疗的患者均完成了治疗。

局限性

这是一项非盲比较研究。

结论

将 L-Amb 与 SSG 治疗利什曼原虫(V)巴西利什曼原虫进行比较表明,前者有效、耐受性更好、更具成本效益。因此,L-AmB 应被视为治疗皮肤利什曼原虫(V)巴西利什曼原虫感染的首选方案。

相似文献

1
Liposomal amphotericin B in comparison to sodium stibogluconate for Leishmania braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis in travelers.脂质体两性霉素 B 与葡萄糖酸锑钠治疗旅行者巴西利什曼原虫皮肤利什曼病的比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Feb;68(2):284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
2
Liposomal amphotericin B in comparison to sodium stibogluconate for cutaneous infection due to Leishmania braziliensis.脂质体两性霉素B与葡糖酸锑钠治疗巴西利什曼原虫引起的皮肤感染的比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.044. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
3
Liposomal amphotericin B treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania tropica.脂质体两性霉素 B 治疗热带利什曼原虫引起的皮肤利什曼病。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Aug;25(8):973-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03908.x. Epub 2010 Dec 5.
4
Successful liposomal amphotericin B treatment of Leishmania braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis.脂质体两性霉素B成功治疗巴西利什曼原虫皮肤利什曼病。
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jul;153(1):203-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06670.x.
5
Intralesional sodium stibogluconate alone or its combination with either intramuscular sodium stibogluconate or oral ketoconazole in the treatment of localized cutaneous leishmaniasis: a comparative study.局部皮肤利什曼病单独使用或联合肌内注射葡萄糖酸锑钠或口服酮康唑治疗的比较研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Mar;24(3):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03417.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
6
Clinical and parasite species risk factors for pentavalent antimonial treatment failure in cutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru.秘鲁皮肤利什曼病中五价锑治疗失败的临床和寄生虫种类风险因素
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):223-31. doi: 10.1086/524042.
7
[Leishmania braziliensis: report of a pediatric imported case with response to liposomal amphotericin B].[巴西利什曼原虫:1例对脂质体两性霉素B有反应的儿科输入性病例报告]
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2007 Jan-Feb;98(1):42-4.
8
Comparison of generic to branded pentavalent antimony for treatment of new world cutaneous leishmaniasis.用于治疗新大陆皮肤利什曼病的非专利药与品牌五价锑的比较。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Nov;71(5):577-81.
9
Failure of Liposomal-amphotericin B Treatment for New World Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania braziliensis.脂质体两性霉素B治疗巴西利什曼原虫引起的新大陆皮肤利什曼病失败
Intern Med. 2020;59(9):1227-1230. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4096-19. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Efficacy of miltefosine for Bolivian cutaneous leishmaniasis.米替福新治疗玻利维亚皮肤利什曼病的疗效。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Feb;78(2):210-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic characterization of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis associated with antimony therapeutic failure and variable in vitro tolerance to amphotericin B.与锑治疗失败及对两性霉素B的体外耐受性可变相关的巴西利什曼原虫(Viannia亚属)的基因组特征
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96849-z.
2
Field Efficacy of Topical Nano-Liposomal Amphotericin B (Sina Ampholeish®) Alone or in Combination with Glucantime® and Cryotherapy on Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.局部应用纳米脂质体两性霉素B(Sina Ampholeish®)单独或与戊烷脒(Glucantime®)及冷冻疗法联合治疗人类皮肤利什曼病的现场疗效
Iran J Parasitol. 2023 Oct-Dec;18(4):419-426. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v18i4.14241.
3
Failure to Detect Leishmania in the Blood of Patients with Old-World Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Implications for Blood Donation.
未能在旧大陆皮肤利什曼病患者的血液中检测到利什曼原虫:对献血的影响。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Oct 10;107(5):996-998. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1120. Print 2022 Nov 14.
4
Meglumine antimoniate was associated with a higher cure rate than liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of American tegumentary leishmaniasis: A retrospective cohort study from a -endemic area.葡甲胺锑酸钠治疗皮肤利什曼病的治愈率高于脂质体两性霉素 B:来自流行地区的回顾性队列研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Sep 23;12:993338. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.993338. eCollection 2022.
5
Cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers and migrants: a 10-year case series in a Canadian reference centre for tropical diseases.旅行者和移民中的皮肤利什曼病:加拿大热带病参考中心的 10 年病例系列。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jun 21;10(2):E546-E553. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210238. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
6
Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Insights into Species-Specific Responses: A Narrative Review.皮肤利什曼病的治疗及物种特异性反应的见解:一篇叙述性综述
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Apr;11(2):695-711. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00602-2. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Outbreak of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis among military personnel in French Guiana, 2020: Clinical, phylogenetic, individual and environmental aspects.2020 年法属圭亚那军人中皮肤利什曼病的爆发:临床、系统发育、个体和环境方面。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 19;15(11):e0009938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009938. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B efficacy and safety for cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.静脉注射脂质体两性霉素 B 治疗皮肤和黏膜利什曼病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e045707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045707.
9
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis - challenges and opportunities.皮肤利什曼病治疗中的药代动力学与药效学——挑战与机遇
RSC Med Chem. 2021 Jan 7;12(4):472-482. doi: 10.1039/d0md00343c.
10
Failure of Liposomal-amphotericin B Treatment for New World Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania braziliensis.脂质体两性霉素B治疗巴西利什曼原虫引起的新大陆皮肤利什曼病失败
Intern Med. 2020;59(9):1227-1230. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4096-19. Epub 2020 May 1.