Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Mol Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;82(5):860-75. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.080531. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Drug discovery programs increasingly are focusing on allosteric modulators as a means to modify the activity of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets. Allosteric binding sites are topographically distinct from the endogenous ligand (orthosteric) binding site, which allows for co-occupation of a single receptor with the endogenous ligand and an allosteric modulator that can alter receptor pharmacological characteristics. Negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) inhibit and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) enhance the affinity and/or efficacy of orthosteric agonists. Established approaches for estimation of affinity and efficacy values for orthosteric ligands are not appropriate for allosteric modulators, and this presents challenges for fully understanding the actions of novel modulators of GPCRs. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu(5)) is a family C GPCR for which a large array of allosteric modulators have been identified. We took advantage of the many tools for probing allosteric sites on mGlu(5) to validate an operational model of allosterism that allows quantitative estimation of modulator affinity and cooperativity values. Affinity estimates derived from functional assays fit well with affinities measured in radioligand binding experiments for both PAMs and NAMs with diverse chemical scaffolds and varying degrees of cooperativity. We observed modulation bias for PAMs when we compared mGlu(5)-mediated Ca(2+) mobilization and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation data. Furthermore, we used this model to quantify the effects of mutations that reduce binding or potentiation by PAMs. This model can be applied to PAM and NAM potency curves in combination with maximal fold-shift data to derive reliable estimates of modulator affinities.
药物发现计划越来越多地将别构调节剂作为一种调节 G 蛋白偶联受体 (GPCR) 靶点活性的手段。别构结合位点在拓扑上与内源性配体(正位)结合位点不同,这允许单个受体与内源性配体和别构调节剂共同占据,而别构调节剂可以改变受体的药理学特征。负变构调节剂 (NAM) 抑制,正变构调节剂 (PAM) 增强正位激动剂的亲和力和/或效力。用于估计正位配体亲和力和效力值的既定方法不适用于别构调节剂,这为全面理解 GPCR 新型调节剂的作用带来了挑战。代谢型谷氨酸受体 5 (mGlu(5)) 是一种 C 族 GPCR,已经鉴定出了大量的别构调节剂。我们利用了许多用于探测 mGlu(5)上别构位点的工具,验证了一种别构作用的操作模型,该模型允许定量估计调节剂的亲和力和协同作用值。从功能测定中得出的亲和力估计值与放射性配体结合实验中测量的 PAMs 和 NAMs 的亲和力很好地吻合,这些 PAMs 和 NAMs 具有不同的化学结构和不同程度的协同作用。当我们比较 mGlu(5)介导的 Ca(2+)动员和细胞外信号调节激酶 1/2 磷酸化数据时,我们观察到 PAMs 的调制偏倚。此外,我们使用该模型量化了降低 PAMs 结合或增强作用的突变的影响。该模型可与最大折叠移位数据结合用于 PAM 和 NAM 效力曲线,以得出调节剂亲和力的可靠估计值。