Department of Gynaecological Oncology, EGA Institute for Women's Health, Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, and Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, First floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Dec;286(6):1555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2492-2. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
LS women have a 40-60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Most international guidelines recommend screening. However, data on efficacy are limited.
To assess the performance of OHES for EC screening in LS and compare it with transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) alone.
A prospective observational cohort study of LS women attending a tertiary high-risk familial gynaecological cancer clinic was conducted. LS women opting for EC screening underwent annual OHES and TVS. Histopathological specimens were processed using a strict protocol. Data of women screened between October 2007 and March 2010 were analysed from a bespoke database. Histology was used as the gold standard. Diagnostic accuracy of OHES was compared with TVS using specificity, and positive (PLR) and negative (NLR) likelihood ratios.
Forty-one LS women underwent 69 screens (41 prevalent, 28 incident). Four (three prevalent, one incident) women were detected to have EC/atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), five had endometrial polyps and two had endometrial hyperplasia (EH) on OHES. TVS detected two of four EC/AEH. OHES had similar specificity of 89.8% (CI 79.2, 96.2%), but higher PLR 9.8 (CI 4.6, 21) and lower NLR (zero) compared to TVS: specificity 84.75%(CI 73, 92.8%), PLR 3.28 (CI 1.04, 10.35) and NLR 0.59 (CI 0.22, 1.58). No interval cancers occurred over a median follow-up of 22 months. The annual incidence was 3.57% (CI 0.09, 18.35) for EC, 10.71% (CI 2.27, 28.23) for polyps and 21.4% (CI 8.3, 40.1) for any endometrial pathology.
Our findings suggest that in LS, annual OHES is acceptable and has high diagnostic accuracy for EC/AEH screening. Larger international studies are needed for confirmation, given the relatively small numbers of LS women at individual centres. It reinforces the current recommendation that endometrial sampling is crucial when screening these women.
LS 女性一生中患子宫内膜癌(EC)的风险为 40-60%。大多数国际指南建议进行筛查。然而,关于疗效的数据有限。
评估 OHES 在 LS 中用于 EC 筛查的性能,并将其与单独的经阴道超声(TVS)进行比较。
对一家三级高危妇科癌症家族诊所就诊的 LS 女性进行前瞻性观察队列研究。选择进行 EC 筛查的 LS 女性每年接受 OHES 和 TVS 检查。使用严格的方案处理组织病理学标本。从一个定制的数据库中分析了 2007 年 10 月至 2010 年 3 月间接受筛查的女性的数据。以组织学为金标准。使用特异性、阳性(PLR)和阴性(NLR)似然比比较 OHES 的诊断准确性。
41 名 LS 女性进行了 69 次筛查(41 次为现患,28 次为新发)。在 OHES 上,有 4 名(3 名现患,1 名新发)女性被发现患有 EC/非典型子宫内膜增生(AEH),5 名患有子宫内膜息肉,2 名患有子宫内膜增生(EH)。TVS 检测到 4 名 EC/AEH 中的 2 名。OHES 的特异性相似,为 89.8%(95%CI 79.2,96.2%),但 PLR 较高,为 9.8(95%CI 4.6,21),NLR 较低,为零:特异性为 84.75%(95%CI 73,92.8%),PLR 为 3.28(95%CI 1.04,10.35),NLR 为 0.59(95%CI 0.22,1.58)。在中位数为 22 个月的中位随访期间,未发生间隔期癌症。EC 的年发生率为 3.57%(95%CI 0.09,18.35),息肉为 10.71%(95%CI 2.27,28.23),任何子宫内膜病变为 21.4%(95%CI 8.3,40.1)。
我们的研究结果表明,在 LS 中,每年进行 OHES 是可以接受的,并且对 EC/AEH 筛查具有较高的诊断准确性。鉴于各中心 LS 女性人数相对较少,需要更大规模的国际研究来证实这一结果。这再次强调了目前的建议,即对这些女性进行筛查时,子宫内膜取样至关重要。