• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在旋磨术期间,使用β受体阻滞剂与血流缓慢无关。

Beta-blocker use is not associated with slow flow during rotational atherectomy.

作者信息

Sakakura Kenichi, Ako Junya, Wada Hiroshi, Naito Ryo, Arao Kenshiro, Funayama Hiroshi, Kubo Norifumi, Momomura Shin-ichi

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Amanuma 1-847, Omiya, Saitama, 330-8503 Japan.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Aug;24(8):379-84.

PMID:22865307
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between beta-blocker use and slow flow during rotational atherectomy (RA).

BACKGROUND

RA is often performed as part of percutaneous coronary interventions for the treatment of calcified lesions; however, the procedure can be complicated by slow flow. Previous reports suggested that the use of beta-blockers was associated with slow flow during RA.

METHODS

A total of 186 patients who received RA were included, and 87 patients were on beta-blockers. The occurrence of slow flow was compared between the beta-blocker group (n = 87) and the non-beta-blocker group (n = 99). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate whether the use of beta-blockers was associated with slow flow.

RESULTS

The occurrence of slow flow was not different between the beta-blocker group (29.9%) and the non-beta-blocker group (24.2%; P=.39). The use of beta-blockers was not significantly associated with slow flow (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.68; P=.49) after controlling for all potential confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no definitive association between slow flow and the use of beta-blockers during RA. There is no need to discontinue beta-blockers in patients receiving RA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在旋磨术(RA)期间使用β受体阻滞剂与慢血流之间的关联。

背景

RA常作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗钙化病变的一部分进行;然而,该手术可能会因慢血流而变得复杂。先前的报告表明,在RA期间使用β受体阻滞剂与慢血流有关。

方法

共纳入186例接受RA的患者,其中87例患者正在使用β受体阻滞剂。比较β受体阻滞剂组(n = 87)和非β受体阻滞剂组(n = 99)中慢血流的发生率。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以研究使用β受体阻滞剂是否与慢血流有关。

结果

β受体阻滞剂组(29.9%)和非β受体阻滞剂组(24.2%;P = 0.39)中慢血流的发生率没有差异。在控制所有潜在混杂因素后,使用β受体阻滞剂与慢血流没有显著关联(比值比,0.75;95%置信区间,0.34 - 1.68;P = 0.49)。

结论

在RA期间,慢血流与使用β受体阻滞剂之间没有明确的关联。接受RA的患者无需停用β受体阻滞剂。

相似文献

1
Beta-blocker use is not associated with slow flow during rotational atherectomy.在旋磨术期间,使用β受体阻滞剂与血流缓慢无关。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Aug;24(8):379-84.
2
The incidence of slow flow after rotational atherectomy of calcified coronary arteries: A randomized study of low speed versus high speed.钙化冠状动脉旋磨术后慢血流的发生率:低速与高速的随机研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;89(5):832-840. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26698. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Comparison of the incidence of slow flow after rotational atherectomy with IVUS-crossable versus IVUS-uncrossable calcified lesions.比较血管内超声可穿越与不可穿越钙化病变旋磨术后慢血流发生率。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68361-z.
4
Modifiable and unmodifiable factors associated with slow flow following rotational atherectomy.与旋磨术后血流缓慢相关的可改变和不可改变因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250757. eCollection 2021.
5
High speed rotational atherectomy: outcome in calcified and noncalcified coronary artery lesions.高速旋磨术:钙化和非钙化冠状动脉病变的治疗结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Sep;26(3):731-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00206-J.
6
Prevention of no-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon during rotational atherectomy--a prospective randomized study comparing intracoronary continuous infusion of verapamil and nicorandil.旋磨术期间无复流/慢血流现象的预防——一项比较冠状动脉内持续输注维拉帕米和尼可地尔的前瞻性随机研究。
Am Heart J. 2007 Nov;154(5):994.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.036. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
Optimizing rotational atherectomy in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROTECT ΙΙ study.优化高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的旋磨术:来自PROTECT ΙΙ研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1057-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25277. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
8
Beyond the balloon: excimer coronary laser atherectomy used alone or in combination with rotational atherectomy in the treatment of chronic total occlusions, non-crossable and non-expansible coronary lesions.球囊之外:准分子冠状动脉激光消蚀术单独或与旋磨术联合用于治疗慢性完全闭塞、不可跨越和不可扩张的冠状动脉病变。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jun 22;9(2):243-50. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I2A40.
9
Secondary rotational atherectomy is associated with reduced occurrence of prolonged ST-segment elevation following ablation.二次旋转动脉旋切术与消融后 ST 段抬高持续时间减少相关。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Oct;18(7):1995-2002. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03385-7. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
10
Intravascular ultrasound-factors associated with slow flow following rotational atherectomy in heavily calcified coronary artery.血管内超声——旋磨术后严重钙化冠状动脉慢血流相关因素
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 5;12(1):5674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09585-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2023.日本心血管介入治疗学会旋磨术临床专家共识文件:2023 年更新版。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Apr;38(2):141-162. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00906-7. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study 1-Year Results.血管内碎石术用于支架置入术前钙化冠状动脉的血管预处理——日本Disrupt CAD IV研究1年结果
Circ Rep. 2022 Aug 20;4(9):399-404. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0068. eCollection 2022 Sep 9.
3
Modifiable and unmodifiable factors associated with slow flow following rotational atherectomy.
与旋磨术后血流缓慢相关的可改变和不可改变因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250757. eCollection 2021.
4
Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗学会旋磨术临床专家共识文件
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00715-w. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Comparison of the incidence of slow flow after rotational atherectomy with IVUS-crossable versus IVUS-uncrossable calcified lesions.比较血管内超声可穿越与不可穿越钙化病变旋磨术后慢血流发生率。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68361-z.
6
Comparison of complications with a 1.25-mm versus a 1.5-mm burr for severely calcified lesions that could not be crossed by an intravascular ultrasound catheter.血管内超声导管无法穿过的严重钙化病变使用1.25毫米与1.5毫米磨头的并发症比较。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Jul;35(3):227-233. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00606-9. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
7
Halfway rotational atherectomy for calcified lesions: Comparison with conventional rotational atherectomy in a propensity-score matched analysis.半旋转动脉旋切术治疗钙化病变:倾向评分匹配分析中与传统旋转动脉旋切术的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0219289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219289. eCollection 2019.
8
Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes between on-label and off-label use of rotational atherectomy.旋磨术标签内使用与标签外使用的中期临床结果比较。
Heart Vessels. 2017 May;32(5):514-519. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0899-6. Epub 2016 Oct 5.